These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19674394)
61. Response inhibition of children with ADHD in the stop-signal task: an event-related potential study. Senderecka M; Grabowska A; Szewczyk J; Gerc K; Chmylak R Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 21641941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Bridging Classical and Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Research: A Longitudinal Analysis of a Large Population Study. Espinoza Oyarce DA; Burns R; Butterworth P; Cherbuin N Front Psychol; 2021; 12():737117. PubMed ID: 35069316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Motivational Sensitivities Linked to Impulsive Motor Errors in Parkinson's Disease. Laurent R; van Wouwe NC; Turchan M; Tolleson C; Phibbs F; Bradley E; van den Wildenberg W; Wylie SA J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2018 Feb; 24(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 28828997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Structural Relationships Among the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism. Spencer CC; Foster JD; Bedwell JS J Pers Disord; 2018 Oct; 32(5):654-667. PubMed ID: 28926305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. What motivates academic dishonesty in students? A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation. Bacon AM; McDaid C; Williams N; Corr PJ Br J Educ Psychol; 2020 Mar; 90(1):152-166. PubMed ID: 30741407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Construct validity of questionnaires for the original and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory. Leue A; Reuter M; Corr PJ; Ettinger U Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1026894. PubMed ID: 36478928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation. Reuter M; Cooper AJ; Smillie LD; Markett S; Montag C Front Syst Neurosci; 2015; 9():38. PubMed ID: 25852497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. The effects of fetal alcohol syndrome on response execution and inhibition: an event-related potential study. Burden MJ; Andrew C; Saint-Amour D; Meintjes EM; Molteno CD; Hoyme HE; Robinson LK; Khaole N; Nelson CA; Jacobson JL; Jacobson SW Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1994-2004. PubMed ID: 19719791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Individual differences of conflict monitoring and feedback processing during reinforcement learning in a mock forensic context. Leue A; Nieden K; Scheuble V; Beauducel A Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 20(2):408-426. PubMed ID: 32043207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Mediating Effect of Trait Emotional Intelligence Between the Behavioral Activation System (BAS)/Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) and Positive and Negative Affect. Merchán-Clavellino A; Alameda-Bailén JR; Zayas García A; Guil R Front Psychol; 2019; 10():424. PubMed ID: 30890980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Cohen JD Cereb Cortex; 2005 May; 15(5):535-44. PubMed ID: 15319308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Practice on conflict tasks promotes executive function of working memory in the elderly. Osaka M; Yaoi K; Otsuka Y; Katsuhara M; Osaka N Behav Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 233(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 22579495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Performance monitoring following conflict: internal adjustments in cognitive control? Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Baldwin SA Neuropsychologia; 2012 Feb; 50(3):426-33. PubMed ID: 22234168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Cognitive control and conflict adaptation in youth with high-functioning autism. Larson MJ; South M; Clayson PE; Clawson A J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2012 Apr; 53(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 22176206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: implications for personality measurement. Smillie LD; Pickering AD; Jackson CJ Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(4):320-35. PubMed ID: 17201591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study. Barry RJ; De Blasio FM Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 23792217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Resting Frontal Asymmetry and Reward Sensitivity Theory Motivational Traits. De Pascalis V; Sommer K; Scacchia P Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13154. PubMed ID: 30177698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Alcohol use as a behavioural sign of disinhibition: evidence from J.A. Gray's model of personality. Pardo Y; Aguilar R; Molinuevo B; Torrubia R Addict Behav; 2007 Oct; 32(10):2398-403. PubMed ID: 17407802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]