These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19674829)

  • 1. An imprecise fuzzy risk approach for water quality management of a river system.
    Rehana S; Mujumdar PP
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3653-64. PubMed ID: 19674829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An inexact optimization approach for river water-quality management.
    Karmakar S; Mujumdar PP
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Nov; 81(3):233-48. PubMed ID: 16545902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactive fuzzy optimization for an economic and environmental balance in a river system.
    Lee CS; Chang SP
    Water Res; 2005 Jan; 39(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 15607180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing water quality in rivers with fuzzy inference systems: a case study.
    Ocampo-Duque W; Ferré-Huguet N; Domingo JL; Schuhmacher M
    Environ Int; 2006 Aug; 32(6):733-42. PubMed ID: 16678900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust stochastic fuzzy possibilistic programming for environmental decision making under uncertainty.
    Zhang X; Huang GH; Nie X
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 19863998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of river water quality using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach.
    Chang NB; Chen HW; Ning SK
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Nov; 63(3):293-305. PubMed ID: 11775501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of groundwater quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation.
    Dahiya S; Singh B; Gaur S; Garg VK; Kushwaha HS
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Aug; 147(3):938-46. PubMed ID: 17337324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A game theoretic approach for trading discharge permits in rivers.
    Niksokhan MH; Kerachian R; Karamouz M
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):793-804. PubMed ID: 19657175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis and prediction of flow from local source in a river basin using a Neuro-fuzzy modeling tool.
    Aqil M; Kita I; Yano A; Nishiyama S
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Oct; 85(1):215-23. PubMed ID: 17110016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Waste management with recourse: an inexact dynamic programming model containing fuzzy boundary intervals in objectives and constraints.
    Tan Q; Huang GH; Cai YP
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1898-913. PubMed ID: 20580864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interval-parameter semi-infinite fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for environmental management under multiple uncertainties.
    Guo P; Huang GH
    Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 19854040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination.
    Li J; Huang GH; Zeng G; Maqsood I; Huang Y
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):173-88. PubMed ID: 16574309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A combined Monte Carlo and possibilistic approach to uncertainty propagation in event tree analysis.
    Baraldi P; Zio E
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1309-26. PubMed ID: 18631304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fuzzy rule based estimation of agricultural diffuse pollution concentration in streams.
    Singh RM
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2008 Apr; 50(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 19295100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Water quality modelling of the river Yamuna (India) using QUAL2E-UNCAS.
    Paliwal R; Sharma P; Kansal A
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(2):131-44. PubMed ID: 16697517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design of on-line river water quality monitoring systems using the entropy theory: a case study.
    Karamouz M; Nokhandan AK; Kerachian R; Maksimovic C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Aug; 155(1-4):63-81. PubMed ID: 18663591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different methodologies to quantify uncertainties of air emissions.
    Romano D; Bernetti A; De Lauretis R
    Environ Int; 2004 Oct; 30(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15337355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Waste load allocation in rivers under uncertainty: application of social choice procedures.
    Mahjouri N; Abbasi MR
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Feb; 187(2):5. PubMed ID: 25604063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a fuzzy-stochastic nonlinear model to incorporate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.
    Li H; Zhang K
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jan; 111(1-4):1-12. PubMed ID: 19945767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Water quality modeling for load reduction under uncertainty: a Bayesian approach.
    Liu Y; Yang P; Hu C; Guo H
    Water Res; 2008 Jul; 42(13):3305-14. PubMed ID: 18486961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.