These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19675141)

  • 1. Time-modified confounding.
    Platt RW; Schisterman EF; Cole SR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 170(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 19675141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confounding and regression adjustment in difference-in-differences studies.
    Zeldow B; Hatfield LA
    Health Serv Res; 2021 Oct; 56(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33978956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.
    Groenwold RHH; Shofty I; Miočević M; van Smeden M; Klugkist I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 30577773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research.
    Brenner H; Blettner M
    Epidemiology; 1997 Jul; 8(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 9209859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
    Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simulation study of finite-sample properties of marginal structural Cox proportional hazards models.
    Westreich D; Cole SR; Schisterman EF; Platt RW
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2098-109. PubMed ID: 22492660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjusting for time-varying confounders in survival analysis using structural nested cumulative survival time models.
    Seaman S; Dukes O; Keogh R; Vansteelandt S
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):472-483. PubMed ID: 31562652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model specification and unmeasured confounders in partially ecologic analyses based on group proportions of exposed.
    Björk J; Strömberg U
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2005 Jun; 31(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 15999570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of methods to estimate the hazard ratio under conditions of time-varying confounding and nonpositivity.
    Naimi AI; Cole SR; Westreich DJ; Richardson DB
    Epidemiology; 2011 Sep; 22(5):718-23. PubMed ID: 21747286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Misspecification of confounder-exposure and confounder-outcome associations leads to bias in effect estimates.
    Schuster NA; Rijnhart JJM; Bosman LC; Twisk JWR; Klausch T; Heymans MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):11. PubMed ID: 36635655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.
    Kyle RP; Moodie EE; Klein MB; Abrahamowicz M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 184(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 27416840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjustment for time-dependent unmeasured confounders in marginal structural Cox models using validation sample data.
    Burne RM; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 28835193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of the structure and magnitude of time-varying uncontrolled confounding in simulated cohort data analyzed using g-computation.
    Soohoo M; Arah OA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Dec; 52(6):1907-1913. PubMed ID: 37898996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative Bias Analysis for a Misclassified Confounder: A Comparison Between Marginal Structural Models and Conditional Models for Point Treatments.
    Nab L; Groenwold RHH; van Smeden M; Keogh RH
    Epidemiology; 2020 Nov; 31(6):796-805. PubMed ID: 32826524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.
    Cole SR; Hernán MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 168(6):656-64. PubMed ID: 18682488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Causal logistic models for non-compliance under randomized treatment with univariate binary response.
    Ten Have TR; Joffe M; Cary M
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1255-83. PubMed ID: 12687654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men.
    Hernán MA; Brumback B; Robins JM
    Epidemiology; 2000 Sep; 11(5):561-70. PubMed ID: 10955409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing mediation using marginal structural models in the presence of confounding and moderation.
    Coffman DL; Zhong W
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):642-64. PubMed ID: 22905648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for uncertainty in confounder and effect modifier selection when estimating average causal effects in generalized linear models.
    Wang C; Dominici F; Parmigiani G; Zigler CM
    Biometrics; 2015 Sep; 71(3):654-65. PubMed ID: 25899155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation from a known Cox MSM using standard parametric models for the g-formula.
    Young JG; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):1001-14. PubMed ID: 24151138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.