These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. The focus on bibliometrics makes papers less useful. Werner R Nature; 2015 Jan; 517(7534):245. PubMed ID: 25592498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback. Korngreen A Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The real dirty secret of academic publishing. Svetlov V Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reviewing should be shown in publication list. Clausen T; Nielsen OB Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In scientific publishing at the article level, effort matters more than journal impact factors: hard work and co-authors overshadow journal venue in acquiring citations. Winker K Bioessays; 2011 Jun; 33(6):400-2. PubMed ID: 21538415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality. Gibson TA Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):408. PubMed ID: 17653166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. How should research productivity be assessed in early career psychiatric researchers? research funding versus scientific productivity. de Leon J J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Sep; 70(9):1327-8; author reply 1328. PubMed ID: 19818260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]