These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19675730)

  • 1. A note on the use of the non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test in the analysis of medical studies.
    Kühnast C; Neuhäuser M
    Ger Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 6():Doc02. PubMed ID: 19675730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney odds ratio: A statistical measure for ordinal outcomes such as EDSS.
    Howard CW; Zou G; Morrow SA; Fridman S; Racosta JM
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2022 Mar; 59():103516. PubMed ID: 35123291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Case for omitting tied observations in the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.
    McGee M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200837. PubMed ID: 30040850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental comparison of parametric versus nonparametric analyses of data from the cold pressor test.
    Treister R; Nielsen CS; Stubhaug A; Farrar JT; Pud D; Sawilowsky S; Oaklander AL
    J Pain; 2015 Jun; 16(6):537-48. PubMed ID: 25801300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies--a paradox of statistical practice?
    Fagerland MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():78. PubMed ID: 22697476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A note on consistency of non-parametric rank tests and related rank transformations.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 21518333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting quality of multivariable logistic regression in selected Indian medical journals.
    Kumar R; Indrayan A; Chhabra P
    J Postgrad Med; 2012; 58(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 22718056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical research XVI. Differences between medians with the Mann-Whitney U test].
    Rivas-Ruiz R; Moreno-Palacios J; Talavera JO
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2013; 51(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 24021070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Relative Power of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test and Student t Test Under Simple Bounded Transformations.
    Zimmerman DW; Zumbo BD
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Oct; 117(4):425-436. PubMed ID: 28142339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The t test and beyond: Recommendations for testing the central tendencies of two independent samples in research on speech, language and hearing pathology.
    Rietveld T; van Hout R
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 58():158-68. PubMed ID: 26386718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method.
    Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.
    Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of statistical tests and statistical software choice in 2014: tale from three Medline indexed Pakistani journals.
    Shaikh MA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Apr; 66(4):464-6. PubMed ID: 27122277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When t-tests or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests won't do.
    McElduff F; Cortina-Borja M; Chan SK; Wade A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Sep; 34(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 20826766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence intervals of the Mann-Whitney parameter that are compatible with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
    Fay MP; Malinovsky Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(27):3991-4006. PubMed ID: 29984411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal design of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-test.
    Bürkner PC; Doebler P; Holling H
    Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 27243898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal sample size planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
    Happ M; Bathke AC; Brunner E
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(3):363-375. PubMed ID: 30298671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical grand rounds: a review of analysis and sample size calculation considerations for Wilcoxon tests.
    Divine G; Norton HJ; Hunt R; Dienemann J
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Sep; 117(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 23456667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.