206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19679090)
1. Protein-peptide interactions adopt the same structural motifs as monomeric protein folds.
Vanhee P; Stricher F; Baeten L; Verschueren E; Lenaerts T; Serrano L; Rousseau F; Schymkowitz J
Structure; 2009 Aug; 17(8):1128-36. PubMed ID: 19679090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interaction interfaces of protein domains are not topologically equivalent across families within superfamilies: Implications for metabolic and signaling pathways.
Rekha N; Machado SM; Narayanan C; Krupa A; Srinivasan N
Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(2):339-53. PubMed ID: 15562516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PIBASE: a comprehensive database of structurally defined protein interfaces.
Davis FP; Sali A
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1901-7. PubMed ID: 15657096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Geometric similarities of protein-protein interfaces at atomic resolution are only observed within homologous families: an exhaustive structural classification study.
Kinjo AR; Nakamura H
J Mol Biol; 2010 Jun; 399(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 20417638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Towards a structural classification of phosphate binding sites in protein-nucleotide complexes: an automated all-against-all structural comparison using geometric matching.
Brakoulias A; Jackson RM
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 15211509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equivalent binding sites reveal convergently evolved interaction motifs.
Henschel A; Kim WK; Schroeder M
Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 16287935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking and backbone flexibility treatment with multiconformational superposition.
Ma XH; Li CH; Shen LZ; Gong XQ; Chen WZ; Wang CX
Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):319-23. PubMed ID: 15981260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting protein-peptide interactions via a network-based motif sampler.
Reiss DJ; Schwikowski B
Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i274-82. PubMed ID: 15262809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protein-protein interactions: a simple strategy to identify binding sites and peptide antagonists.
Sandomenico A; Monti SM; Sabatella M; De Capua A; Tornatore L; Doti N; Viparelli F; Dathan NA; Pedone C; Ruvo M; Marasco D
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 May; 73(5):483-93. PubMed ID: 19366357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structural classification of thioredoxin-like fold proteins.
Qi Y; Grishin NV
Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 15558583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction.
Moult J
Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2005 Jun; 15(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 15939584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SCOWLP: a web-based database for detailed characterization and visualization of protein interfaces.
Teyra J; Doms A; Schroeder M; Pisabarro MT
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():104. PubMed ID: 16512892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sub-angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins.
Raveh B; London N; Schueler-Furman O
Proteins; 2010 Jul; 78(9):2029-40. PubMed ID: 20455260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variable conformation and dynamics of calmodulin complexed with peptides derived from the autoinhibitory domains of target proteins.
Yao Y; Squier TC
Biochemistry; 1996 May; 35(21):6815-27. PubMed ID: 8639633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discovering motif pairs at interaction sites from protein sequences on a proteome-wide scale.
Li H; Li J; Wong L
Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):989-96. PubMed ID: 16446278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Architecture of basic building blocks in protein and domain structural interaction networks.
Moon HS; Bhak J; Lee KH; Lee D
Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1479-86. PubMed ID: 15613386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization by NMR and molecular modeling of the binding of polyisoprenols and polyisoprenyl recognition sequence peptides: 3D structure of the complexes reveals sites of specific interactions.
Zhou GP; Troy FA
Glycobiology; 2003 Feb; 13(2):51-71. PubMed ID: 12626407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.
Laurie AT; Jackson RM
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15701681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In silico grouping of peptide/HLA class I complexes using structural interaction characteristics.
Tong JC; Tan TW; Ranganathan S
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 17090577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peptides mediating interaction networks: new leads at last.
Neduva V; Russell RB
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2006 Oct; 17(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 16962311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
