These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19679859)

  • 61. Age differences and similarities in the shift from computation to retrieval during reading comprehension.
    Rawson KA; Touron DR
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Jun; 24(2):423-37. PubMed ID: 19485659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The influence of encoding and testing directions on retrieval of spatial information in explored and described environments.
    Santoro I; Sors F; Mingolo S; Prpic V; Grassi M; Agostini T; Murgia M
    J Gen Psychol; 2021; 148(1):2-25. PubMed ID: 31809248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension.
    Wells JB; Christiansen MH; Race DS; Acheson DJ; MacDonald MC
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Mar; 58(2):250-71. PubMed ID: 18922516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Individual differences in children's comprehension of temporal relations: Dissociable contributions of working memory capacity and working memory updating.
    Karlsson J; Jolles D; Koornneef A; van den Broek P; Van Leijenhorst L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Sep; 185():1-18. PubMed ID: 31077975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Procedural interference in perceptual classification: implicit learning or cognitive complexity?
    Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Zaki SR
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1256-71. PubMed ID: 16532858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension.
    Traxler MJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 18605495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Walking through doorways causes forgetting: situation models and experienced space.
    Radvansky GA; Copeland DE
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1150-6. PubMed ID: 17128613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 15945205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The relationship between age, verbal working memory, and language comprehension.
    DeDe G; Caplan D; Kemtes K; Waters G
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Dec; 19(4):601-16. PubMed ID: 15584786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Spatial Situation Models and Text Comprehension.
    Haenggi D; Kintsch W; Gernsbacher MA
    Discourse Process; 1995 Mar; 19(2):173-199. PubMed ID: 25520531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Using what we know: Consequences of intentionally retrieving gist versus item-specific information.
    Koutstaal W; Cavendish M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):778-91. PubMed ID: 16822146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Coincident orientation of objects and viewpoint-dependence in scene recognition.
    Li J; Zhang K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Feb; 114(1):301-9. PubMed ID: 22582697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension.
    Sesma HW; Mahone EM; Levine T; Eason SH; Cutting LE
    Child Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 15(3):232-46. PubMed ID: 18629674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach.
    Shah P; Miyake A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1996 Mar; 125(1):4-27. PubMed ID: 8851737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. How body asymmetries determine accessibility in spatial frameworks.
    Bryant DJ; Wright WG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):487-508. PubMed ID: 10428687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating.
    Swallow KM; Zacks JM; Abrams RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):236-57. PubMed ID: 19397382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.
    Bao M; Li ZH; Zhang DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Influence of mapping complexity on negative priming for incompatible spatial mappings.
    Read LE; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1118-23. PubMed ID: 19966265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Working memory, text comprehension, and propositional reasoning: a new Semantic Anaphora WM test.
    Carriedo N; Elosúa MR; García-Madruga JA
    Span J Psychol; 2011 May; 14(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 21568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Updating of working memory: lingering bindings.
    Oberauer K; Vockenberg K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):967-87. PubMed ID: 19034717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.