These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19679860)

  • 1. Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.
    Bruno D; Higham PA; Perfect TJ
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 19679860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The list strength effect: a contextual competition account.
    Diana RA; Reder LM
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1289-302. PubMed ID: 16532860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.
    Diana RA; Reder LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):805-15. PubMed ID: 16822148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.
    Reder LM; Angstadt P; Cary M; Erickson MA; Ayers MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):138-52. PubMed ID: 11827076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation.
    Arndt J; Reder LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):830-42. PubMed ID: 12219793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.
    Ratcliff R; Starns JJ
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):59-83. PubMed ID: 19159148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memoir study: Investigating image memorability across developmental stages.
    Almog G; Alavi Naeini S; Hu Y; Duerden EG; Mohsenzadeh Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295940. PubMed ID: 38117776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrieving effectively from source memory: Evidence for differentiation and local matching processes.
    Aytaç S; Kılıç A; Criss AH; Kellen D
    Cogn Psychol; 2024 Mar; 149():101617. PubMed ID: 38183756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal detection with criterion noise: applications to recognition memory.
    Benjamin AS; Diaz M; Wee S
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):84-115. PubMed ID: 19159149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Criterial noise effects on rule-based category learning: the impact of delayed feedback.
    Ell SW; Ing AD; Maddox WT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1263-75. PubMed ID: 19633342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The striking similarities between standard, distractor-free, and target-free recognition.
    Cox JC; Dobbins IG
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):925-40. PubMed ID: 21476108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memorability of line drawings of scenes: the role of contour properties.
    Han S; Rezanejad M; Walther DB
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37903987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Memorable beginnings, but forgettable endings: Intrinsic memorability alters our subjective experience of time.
    Gedvila M; Ongchoco JDK; Bainbridge WA
    Vis cogn; 2023; 31(5):380-389. PubMed ID: 38708421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep neural network decodes aspects of stimulus-intrinsic memorability inaccessible to humans.
    Zhao C; Kim J; Tang TH; Saito JM; Fukuda K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Apr; 153(4):1131-1138. PubMed ID: 38300543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective self-experiences at the mirror in patients with schizophrenia.
    Poletti M; Raballo A
    Schizophr Res; 2023 Oct; 260():180-182. PubMed ID: 37677923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A strength-based mirror effect persists even when criterion shifts are unlikely.
    Koop GJ; Criss AH; Pardini AM
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):842-854. PubMed ID: 30790209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.
    Hilford A; Glanzer M; Kim K; Maloney LT
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Feb; 47(2):266-278. PubMed ID: 30288686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue quality and criterion setting in recognition memory.
    Kent C; Lamberts K; Patton R
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jul; 46(5):757-769. PubMed ID: 29396751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.
    Franks BA; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1215-1227. PubMed ID: 27400995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. They can take a hint: Older adults effectively integrate memory cues during recognition.
    Konkel A; Selmeczy D; Dobbins IG
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):781-94. PubMed ID: 26652722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.