174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19680089)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of the vertebral jack tool and the inflatable bone tamp for reduction of osteoporotic spine fractures.
Sietsma MS; Hosman AJ; Verdonschot NJ; Aalsma AM; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E640-4. PubMed ID: 19680089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus extrapedicular vertebroplasty using polymethylmethacrylate.
Erkan S; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Cho W; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 May; 23(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20065863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical performance of the new BeadEx implant in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: restoration and maintenance of height and stability.
Kettler A; Schmoelz W; Shezifi Y; Ohana N; Ben-Arye A; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):676-82. PubMed ID: 16567025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is kyphoplasty better than vertebroplasty in restoring normal mechanical function to an injured spine?
Luo J; Bertram W; Sangar D; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1050-7. PubMed ID: 20004264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of augmentation techniques for insufficiency fractures.
McCann H; LePine M; Glaser J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):E499-502. PubMed ID: 16816750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Molloy S; Mathis JM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1549-54. PubMed ID: 12865843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vertebroplasty: only small cement volumes are required to normalize stress distributions on the vertebral bodies.
Luo J; Daines L; Charalambous A; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2865-73. PubMed ID: 20010394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of bone mineral density after percutaneous kyphoplasty in fresh osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and adjacent vertebrae along with sagittal spine alignment.
Korovessis P; Zacharatos S; Repantis T; Michael A; Karachalios D
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 18525491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical effects of unipedicular vertebroplasty on intact vertebrae.
Higgins KB; Harten RD; Langrana NA; Reiter MF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1540-7; discussion 1548. PubMed ID: 12865841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kyphoplasty reduction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: correction of local kyphosis versus overall sagittal alignment.
Pradhan BB; Bae HW; Kropf MA; Patel VV; Delamarter RB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 16481954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty: restoration of vertebral body height and correction of kyphotic deformity with special attention to the shape of the fractured vertebrae.
Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Jin BH; Kim KS; Yoon YS; Cho YE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):338-44. PubMed ID: 21705918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experimental study of percutaneous vertebroplasty with a novel bone void filling container system].
Wang TP; Zhang KB; Zheng ZM; Liu H; Yu BS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 91(15):1041-6. PubMed ID: 21609639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of bone density on vertebral strength and stiffness after percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Graham J; Ahn C; Hai N; Buch BD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):E505-11. PubMed ID: 17700430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical study on one side approach percutaneous kyphoplasty treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].
Wang J; Zhang N; Liu J; Tian H; Chen C
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 23(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 19192883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty.
Steinmann J; Tingey CT; Cruz G; Dai Q
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 15644756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of endplate-to-endplate cement augmentation on vertebral strength and stiffness in vertebroplasty.
Steens J; Verdonschot N; Aalsma AM; Hosman AJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):E419-22. PubMed ID: 17621198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Different approaches of vertebroplasty for management of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].
Zeng M; Zhao XJ; Zhang JP; Tan JS
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2006 May; 26(5):640-3. PubMed ID: 16762872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: first short term results].
Voormolen MH; Lohle PN; Fransen H; Juttmann JR; de Waal Malefijt J; Lampmann LE
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Aug; 147(32):1549-53. PubMed ID: 12942845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
