These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19680183)

  • 1. Study of the interocclusal distortion in impressions taken with different types of closed-mouth trays and two types of impression materials.
    Mañes-Ferrer JF; Selva-Otaolaurruchi EJ; Parra-Arenós C; Selfa-Bas I
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2010 Jan; 15(1):e79-84. PubMed ID: 19680183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Cho GC; Chee WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 15507908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.
    Valderhaug J; Fløystrand F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 6389833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Mendez AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effect on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays].
    Ishida K
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 33(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 2489749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
    Biffar R; Bittner B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double arch impressions for simplified restorative dentistry.
    Wilson EG; Werrin SR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Feb; 49(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 6338215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-way trays: easy to use and abuse.
    Pesun IJ; Swain VL
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec; 74(10):907-11. PubMed ID: 19126360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impression tray--an important factor in impression precision.
    Rehberg HJ
    Int Dent J; 1977 Jun; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 328405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative putty/wash impression technique.
    Bassi GS
    Dent Update; 2000 Oct; 27(8):376-8. PubMed ID: 11218529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy.
    Gökçen-Rohlig B; Ongül D; Sancakli E; Sermet B
    Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 24844388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of a range of addition silicone putty-wash impression materials used in the one-stage technique.
    Abuasi HA; Wassell RW
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 7920403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technique for making flexible impression trays for the microstomic patient.
    Whitsitt JA; Battle LW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):608-9. PubMed ID: 6389845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.