These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19680272)

  • 1. Learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T; Gomes PR; Pierre ET; Pierre LM
    Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):851-6. PubMed ID: 19680272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of learning effect on frequency doubling technology perimetry (Matrix).
    Contestabile MT; Perdicchi A; Amodeo S; Recupero V; Recupero SM
    J Glaucoma; 2007 May; 16(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 17438423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validity of screening for open-angle glaucoma in high-risk populations with single-test screening mode frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT).
    Kamdeu Fansi AA; Li G; Harasymowycz PJ
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Mar; 20(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 20436361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning effect of humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension.
    Centofanti M; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; Orzalesi N; Vetrugno M; Manni G; Rossetti L
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 18794676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning effects among perimetric novices in frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Joson PJ; Kamantigue ME; Chen PP
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Apr; 109(4):757-60. PubMed ID: 11927436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
    Mastropasqua L; Brusini P; Carpineto P; Ciancaglini M; Di Antonio L; Zeppieri MW; Parisi L
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix perimetry.
    Hong S; Na K; Kim CY; Seong GJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 42(5):707-11. PubMed ID: 17823644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Correlation between confocal tomography of the optic nerve (HRT) and the perimetric frequency doubling technology].
    Sampaolesi R; Brusini P; Sampaolesi JR
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Nov; 220(11):754-66. PubMed ID: 14634902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning effect among perimetric novices with screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Brush MB; Chen PP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):551-2. PubMed ID: 15013879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Application of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Kawa P; Jurkowska J; Zarnowski T; Zagórski Z
    Klin Oczna; 2002; 104(5-6):391-4. PubMed ID: 12664488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The methodology of visual field testing with frequency doubling technology in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2006.
    Terry AL; Paulose-Ram R; Tilert TJ; Johnson CA; Zhang X; Lee PP; Saaddine JB
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 17(6):411-21. PubMed ID: 21090914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kook MS; Yang SJ; Kim S; Chung J; Kim ST; Tchah H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 15234286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.
    Kocabeyoglu S; Uzun S; Mocan MC; Bozkurt B; Irkec M; Orhan M
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 61(10):576-9. PubMed ID: 24145558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with open-angle glaucoma.
    De Tarso Pierre-Filho P; Gomes PR; Pierre ET; Pierre LM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(3):538-41. PubMed ID: 20099239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Three Visual Field Tests in Children: Frequency Doubling Test, 24-2 and 30-2 SITA Perimetry.
    Han S; Baek SH; Kim US
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(5):647-650. PubMed ID: 27404791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in migraine.
    Harle DE; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 May; 25(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 15854070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.