146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1968124)
41. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Sonographic study of the pancreas and the large epigastric vessels].
Steinmaurer HJ
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1983 Oct; 133(19-20):483-8. PubMed ID: 6649661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of pancreatic disease.
Novis BH; Narunsky L; Bank S
S Afr Med J; 1976 Sep; 50(39):1501-5. PubMed ID: 982198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: a single unit audit.
MacMahon M; Walsh TN; Brennan P; Osborne H; Courtney MG
Gerontology; 1993; 39(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8095041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Acute biliary pancreatitis: detection of common bile duct stones with endoscopic ultrasound.
Stabuc B; Drobne D; Ferkolj I; Gruden A; Jereb J; Kolar G; Mlinaric V; Mervic M; Repse A; Stepec S; Markovic S
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Dec; 20(12):1171-5. PubMed ID: 18989141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne DH; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Lee MG; Lee HJ; Kim MH; Kang EM; Kim YH; Lee SG; Kim PN; Ha HK; Auh YH
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):663-9. PubMed ID: 9051013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in determining the cause but not course of acute pancreatitis.
Schölmerich J; Lausen M; Lay L; Salm R; Rückauer K; Gross V; Roth M; Leser HG; Farthmann EH
Endoscopy; 1992 May; 24(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 1612037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparative prospective study with conventional ultrasonography, computed tomography, and ERCP.
Buscail L; Escourrou J; Moreau J; Delvaux M; Louvel D; Lapeyre F; Tregant P; Frexinos J
Pancreas; 1995 Apr; 10(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 7624302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The role of ERCP in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Pencev D; Brady PG; Pinkas H; Boulay J
Am J Gastroenterol; 1994 Sep; 89(9):1523-7. PubMed ID: 8079931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Single shot MRI cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a "fast acquisition spin echo" sequence (FASE). Replacement of ERCP?].
Schulte B; Beyer D; Wedekind G; Meuser W
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9538925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Visualization of the pancreatic ducts by ultrasound tomography in pancreatic diseases with bile duct obstruction].
Wermke W; Schulz HJ; Frömmel M
Rofo; 1985 Jul; 143(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 2992011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Neitlich JD; Topazian M; Smith RC; Gupta A; Burrell MI; Rosenfield AT
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 9169700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Upper-abdominal ultrasonography and ERCP? (author's transl)].
Sauerbruch T; Wotzka R; Rehkamp D; Rummel T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Feb; 104(5):165-6, 169-71. PubMed ID: 759175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Analysis of clinical application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the pancreatic diseases in children].
Lü T; Zhang XF
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 51(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 23941844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. A new method of noninvasive biliopancreatic diagnosis].
Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Scipioni A; Di Girolamo M; Sarrantonio A; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1995 Oct; 90(4):438-43. PubMed ID: 8552821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review.
De Lisi S; Leandro G; Buscarini E
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 May; 23(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 21487299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Capps GW; Zfass AM; Baker KM
Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9530295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Prediction of therapy in primary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Nathan T; Kjeldsen J; Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB
Endoscopy; 2004 Jun; 36(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 15202050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Findings of cholangiopancreatography in pseudotumorous pancreatitis.
Hu Y; Xu G
Chin Med J (Engl); 1995 Dec; 108(12):907-9. PubMed ID: 8728942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
