138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19681791)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III classifications in a Turkish primary open-angle glaucoma population.
Bozkurt B; Irkec M; Arslan U
Acta Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 88(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 19681791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.
Ferreras A; Pajarín AB; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1981-7. PubMed ID: 17445899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Rossetti L; Iester M; Fogagnolo P; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2008 Aug; 115(8):1358-65, 1365.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18321579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score.
Coops A; Henson DB; Kwartz AJ; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5348-55. PubMed ID: 17122123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 for glaucoma.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Pajarín AB; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pueyo V
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):354-359. PubMed ID: 18078851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glaucoma probability score vs Moorfields classification in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes.
Moreno-Montañés J; Antón A; García N; Mendiluce L; Ayala E; Sebastián A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):360-368. PubMed ID: 18045569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between discriminant analysis models and "glaucoma probability score" for the detection of glaucomatous optic nerve head changes.
Iester M; Perdicchi A; Capris E; Siniscalco A; Calabria G; Recupero SM
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 18854729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glaucoma diagnostics.
Geimer SA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT 2) parameters in primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle closure glaucoma: a comparative study in an Indian population.
Thomas R; Muliyil J; Simha R A; Parikh RS
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 13(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 17060113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the glaucoma probability score to earlier heidelberg retina tomograph data analysis tools in classifying normal and glaucoma patients.
Yip LW; Mikelberg FS
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(7):513-6. PubMed ID: 18854725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.
Ford BA; Artes PH; McCormick TA; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Ophthalmology; 2003 Jun; 110(6):1145-50. PubMed ID: 12799239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph.
Leung CK; Ye C; Weinreb RN; Cheung CY; Qiu Q; Liu S; Xu G; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 19969364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness values using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-III.
Moreno-Montañés J; Antón A; García N; Olmo N; Morilla A; Fallon M
J Glaucoma; 2009 Sep; 18(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 19745667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score.
Zangwill LM; Jain S; Racette L; Ernstrom KB; Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2653-60. PubMed ID: 17525196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting progression to glaucoma in ocular hypertensive patients.
Strouthidis NG; Gardiner SK; Owen VM; Zuniga C; Garway-Heath DF
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 19730117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity and specificity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II Version 3.0 in a population-based study: the Tajimi Study.
Saito H; Tsutsumi T; Araie M; Tomidokoro A; Iwase A
Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):1854-61. PubMed ID: 19660814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
