These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19681927)

  • 1. Impact fracture resistance of two titanium-abutment systems versus a single-piece ceramic implant.
    Silva NR; Nourian P; Coelho PG; Rekow ED; Thompson VP
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 13(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19681927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stability of prototype two-piece zirconia and titanium implants after artificial aging: an in vitro pilot study.
    Kohal RJ; Finke HC; Klaus G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 18783418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture strength of zirconia implants after artificial aging.
    Andreiotelli M; Kohal RJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 18657150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
    Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
    Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of cyclic loading and preparation on the fracture strength of zirconium-dioxide implants: an in vitro investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Wolkewitz M; Tsakona A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):808-14. PubMed ID: 21320166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.
    Klotz MW; Taylor TD; Goldberg AJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):970-5. PubMed ID: 22010078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of preparation and wall thickness on the resistance to fracture of zirconia implant abutments.
    Att W; Yajima ND; Wolkewitz M; Witkowski S; Strub JR
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e196-203. PubMed ID: 22222141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thickness: part I.
    Albosefi A; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 24417713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload.
    Park JK; Choi JU; Jeon YC; Choi KS; Jeong CM
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 20456024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ceramic implant abutments: cutting efficiency and resultant surface finish by diamond rotary cutting instruments.
    Park SW; Driscoll CF; Romberg EE; Siegel S; Thompson G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 16765157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
    Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture behaviour of zirconia ceramic cantilever fixed dental prostheses in vitro.
    Gabbert O; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Gilde H; Ruef T; Rammelsberg P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):200-6. PubMed ID: 18622828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic zirconia bridges with differing phase stabilizers and quality of sintering.
    Sundh A; Sjögren G
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):778-84. PubMed ID: 16414111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: effect of tooth coloured post material and surface conditioning.
    Toman M; Toksavul S; Sarikanat M; Nergiz I; Schmage P
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20397499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics of implant-CAD/CAM abutment connections of two different internal connection systems.
    Sumi T; Braian M; Shimada A; Shibata N; Takeshita K; Vandeweghe S; Coelho PG; Wennerberg A; Jimbo R
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 May; 39(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 22175784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.