BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19682234)

  • 1. Clinical probability score and D-dimer estimation lack utility in the diagnosis of childhood pulmonary embolism.
    Biss TT; Brandão LR; Kahr WH; Chan AK; Williams S
    J Thromb Haemost; 2009 Oct; 7(10):1633-8. PubMed ID: 19682234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    van Es N; Kraaijpoel N; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Den Exter PL; Mos IC; Galipienzo J; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Apr; 15(4):678-684. PubMed ID: 28106338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Utility of D-dimer assay for diagnosing pulmonary embolism: single institute study].
    Park R; Seo YI; Yoon SG; Choi TY; Shin JW; Uh ST; Kim YK
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Dec; 28(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 19127105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of clinical probability assessment in interpreting a normal d-dimer in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Gibson NS; Sohne M; Gerdes VEA; Nijkeuter M; Buller HR
    Chest; 2008 Oct; 134(4):789-793. PubMed ID: 18641091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is stand-alone D-dimer testing safe to rule out acute pulmonary embolism?
    van Es N; van der Hulle T; Büller HR; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Galipienzo J; Di Nisio M
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Feb; 15(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27873439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple decision rule including D-dimer to reduce the need for computed tomography scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    van Es J; Beenen LF; Douma RA; den Exter PL; Mos IC; Kaasjager HA; Huisman MV; Kamphuisen PW; Middeldorp S; Bossuyt PM
    J Thromb Haemost; 2015 Aug; 13(8):1428-35. PubMed ID: 25990714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
    Douma RA; Gibson NS; Gerdes VE; Büller HR; Wells PS; Perrier A; Le Gal G
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan; 101(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 19132208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.
    Righini M; Van Es J; Den Exter PL; Roy PM; Verschuren F; Ghuysen A; Rutschmann OT; Sanchez O; Jaffrelot M; Trinh-Duc A; Le Gall C; Moustafa F; Principe A; Van Houten AA; Ten Wolde M; Douma RA; Hazelaar G; Erkens PM; Van Kralingen KW; Grootenboers MJ; Durian MF; Cheung YW; Meyer G; Bounameaux H; Huisman MV; Kamphuisen PW; Le Gal G
    JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(11):1117-24. PubMed ID: 24643601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Crane S; Jaconelli T; Eragat M
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2018 Jun; 25(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 28002070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid quantitative D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort management study.
    Bates SM; Takach Lapner S; Douketis JD; Kearon C; Julian J; Parpia S; Schulman S; Weitz JI; Linkins LA; Crowther M; Lim W; Spencer FA; Lee AY; Gross PL; Ginsberg J
    J Thromb Haemost; 2016 Mar; 14(3):504-9. PubMed ID: 26707364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. D-dimer threshold increase with pretest probability unlikely for pulmonary embolism to decrease unnecessary computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography.
    Kline JA; Hogg MM; Courtney DM; Miller CD; Jones AE; Smithline HA
    J Thromb Haemost; 2012 Apr; 10(4):572-81. PubMed ID: 22284935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.
    van Es J; Mos I; Douma R; Erkens P; Durian M; Nizet T; van Houten A; Hofstee H; ten Cate H; Ullmann E; Büller H; Huisman M; Kamphuisen PW
    Thromb Haemost; 2012 Jan; 107(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 22072293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.
    Kabrhel C
    J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: prospective validation of the simplified Geneva score.
    Robert-Ebadi H; Mostaguir K; Hovens MM; Kare M; Verschuren F; Girard P; Huisman MV; Moustafa F; Kamphuisen PW; Buller HR; Righini M; Le Gal G
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Sep; 15(9):1764-1769. PubMed ID: 28688113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.
    Wells PS; Anderson DR; Rodger M; Ginsberg JS; Kearon C; Gent M; Turpie AG; Bormanis J; Weitz J; Chamberlain M; Bowie D; Barnes D; Hirsh J
    Thromb Haemost; 2000 Mar; 83(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 10744147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of "Gestalt" and the Wells Rule.
    Hendriksen JM; Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Geersing GJ
    Ann Fam Med; 2016 May; 14(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 27184993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: a meta-analysis.
    Pasha SM; Klok FA; Snoep JD; Mos IC; Goekoop RJ; Rodger MA; Huisman MV
    Thromb Res; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e123-7. PubMed ID: 19942258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative point-of-care D-dimer testing compared with quantitative D-dimer testing in excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care.
    Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Geersing GJ; Büller HR; Moons KG; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC
    J Thromb Haemost; 2015 Jun; 13(6):1004-9. PubMed ID: 25845618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. C-reactive protein and D-dimer with clinical probability score in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
    Steeghs N; Goekoop RJ; Niessen RW; Jonkers GJ; Dik H; Huisman MV
    Br J Haematol; 2005 Aug; 130(4):614-9. PubMed ID: 16098077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exclusion of venous thromboembolism: evaluation of D-Dimer PLUS for the quantitative determination of D-dimer.
    Vermeer HJ; Ypma P; van Strijen MJ; Muradin AA; Hudig F; Jansen RW; Wijermans PW; Gerrits WB
    Thromb Res; 2005; 115(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 15733971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.