These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19682440)

  • 1. A cuing study of the N2pc component: an index of attentional deployment to objects rather than spatial locations.
    Woodman GF; Arita JT; Luck SJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1297():101-11. PubMed ID: 19682440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The amplitude of N2pc reflects the physical disparity between target item and distracters.
    Zhao G; Liu Q; Zhang Y; Jiao J; Zhang Q; Sun H; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 491(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21215298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Express attentional re-engagement but delayed entry into consciousness following invalid spatial cues in visual search.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(12):e3967. PubMed ID: 19088847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional capture by a color singleton is stronger at spatially relevant than irrelevant locations: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Su Y; Huang W; Yang N; Yan K; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Oct; 57(10):e13640. PubMed ID: 33460208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ERP correlates of anticipatory attention: spatial and non-spatial specificity and relation to subsequent selective attention.
    Dale CL; Simpson GV; Foxe JJ; Luks TL; Worden MS
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 18347786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Covert Spatial Attention Speeds Target Individuation.
    Foster JJ; Bsales EM; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(13):2717-2726. PubMed ID: 32054678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From alternation to repetition: Spatial attention biases contribute to sequential effects in a choice reaction-time task.
    Green JJ; Spalek TM; McDonald JJ
    Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 11(1-2):24-36. PubMed ID: 31512985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses.
    Mazza V; Turatto M; Umiltà C; Eimer M
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 17602216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention and prediction modulations in expected and unexpected visuospatial trajectories.
    Baker KS; Pegna AJ; Yamamoto N; Johnston P
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0242753. PubMed ID: 34624029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting N2pc from anticipatory HbO activity during sustained visuospatial attention: a concurrent fNIRS-ERP study.
    Huang J; Wang F; Ding Y; Niu H; Tian F; Liu H; Song Y
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():225-34. PubMed ID: 25818691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurobehavioral correlates of the rapid formation of the symbolic control of visuospatial attention.
    Trujillo LT; Schnyer DM
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Sep; 48(9):1227-41. PubMed ID: 21446995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control mechanisms mediating shifts of attention in auditory and visual space: a spatio-temporal ERP analysis.
    Green JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McDonald JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):358-69. PubMed ID: 16075294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lateralized Suppression of Alpha-Band EEG Activity As a Mechanism of Target Processing.
    Bacigalupo F; Luck SJ
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 39(5):900-917. PubMed ID: 30523067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study.
    Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Mar; 24(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 23172773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The orienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related brain potential study.
    Talsma D; Slagter HA; Nieuwenhuis S; Hage J; Kok A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 15925498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial cueing in time-space synesthetes: An event-related brain potential study.
    Teuscher U; Brang D; Ramachandran VS; Coulson S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Oct; 74(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20637536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.