These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19682470)

  • 21. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing the effect of verbal working memory load on visuo-spatial exogenous orienting.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 413(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 17174028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Seeing fearful body language overcomes attentional deficits in patients with neglect.
    Tamietto M; Geminiani G; Genero R; de Gelder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):445-54. PubMed ID: 17335393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of low arousal on visuo-spatial attention.
    Fimm B; Willmes K; Spijkers W
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1261-8. PubMed ID: 16530231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits.
    Poynter W; Ingram P; Minor S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19931966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared.
    Kraft A; Pape N; Hagendorf H; Schmidt S; Naito A; Brandt SA
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1133(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 17174284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hemispheric modulations of alpha-band power reflect the rightward shift in attention induced by enhanced attentional load.
    Pérez A; Peers PV; Valdés-Sosa M; Galán L; García L; Martínez-Montes E
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18789956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An electrophysiological investigation of preparatory attentional control in a spatial Stroop task.
    Stern ER; Mangels JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 18(6):1004-17. PubMed ID: 16839306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of spatial attention after brain damage with a dynamic reaction time test.
    Deouell LY; Sacher Y; Soroker N
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2005 Oct; 11(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 16248905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bias in visual attention behavior in a normal school-aged population.
    Cairo Valcarcel E; Ijalba E; Obler LK; Gomez Lozano R; Marin Llanes R; Devia Collazos C; Bouza Herrera C
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):291-6. PubMed ID: 12030455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task.
    Loftus AM; Vijayakumar N; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 19231481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Understanding the effects of moving visual stimuli on unilateral neglect following stroke.
    Plummer P; Dunai J; Morris ME
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Mar; 60(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 16466838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time to imagine space: a chronometric exploration of representational neglect.
    Bartolomeo P; Bachoud-Lévi AC; Azouvi P; Chokron S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1249-57. PubMed ID: 15949509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of the cholinergic agonist nicotine on reorienting of visual spatial attention and top-down attentional control.
    Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroscience; 2008 Mar; 152(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18272290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the interdependency between attentional biases and visual field effects with bilateral presentations of stimuli.
    Lupien S; Lafrance MS; Lecours AR
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Mar; 21(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 8442932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1050-60. PubMed ID: 16330056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.