These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19682674)

  • 1. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time.
    Schreij D; Olivers CN
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19682674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds.
    Fazl A; Grossberg S; Mingolla E
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 18653176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatiotemporal object history affects the selection of task-relevant properties.
    Schreij D; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):216-32. PubMed ID: 22390295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention.
    Moores E; Laiti L; Chelazzi L
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 6(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12514738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit?
    Naili F; Boucart M; Derambure P; Arndt C
    Epilepsy Res; 2009 Dec; 87(2-3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19800764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional prioritizations based on spatial probabilities can be maintained on multiple moving objects.
    Feria CS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):926-38. PubMed ID: 20436190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does attention spread across objects oriented in depth?
    Reppa I; Fougnie D; Schmidt WC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):912-25. PubMed ID: 20436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of instantaneous object input and past experience on object-based attention.
    Ho MC; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19281963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional spreading in object-based attention.
    Richard AM; Lee H; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 18665730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Object-based attention and visual area LO.
    de-Wit LH; Kentridge RW; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1483-90. PubMed ID: 19038274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.
    Riggio L; Iani C; Gherri E; Benatti F; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 17905141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The planning of a sequence of saccades in pro- and antisaccade tasks: influence of visual integration time and concurrent motor processing.
    Lavergne L; Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Orriols E; Doré-Mazars K
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():82-95. PubMed ID: 18929544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lateralized effects of categorical and coordinate spatial processing of component parts on the recognition of 3D non-nameable objects.
    Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 19800727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What antipriming reveals about priming.
    Marsolek CJ
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 May; 12(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 18403251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A foundation for savantism? Visuo-spatial synaesthetes present with cognitive benefits.
    Simner J; Mayo N; Spiller MJ
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1246-60. PubMed ID: 19665699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual feature integration with an attention deficit.
    Arguin M; Cavanagh P; Joanette Y
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Jan; 24(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 8123263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention.
    Luo C; Lupiáñez J; Funes MJ; Fu X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):516-30. PubMed ID: 19565432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.