251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19683550)
1. Development of a high-throughput method to evaluate the impact of inhibitory compounds from lignocellulosic hydrolysates on the growth of Zymomonas mobilis.
Franden MA; Pienkos PT; Zhang M
J Biotechnol; 2009 Dec; 144(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 19683550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transcriptome profiling of Zymomonas mobilis under furfural stress.
He MX; Wu B; Shui ZX; Hu QC; Wang WG; Tan FR; Tang XY; Zhu QL; Pan K; Li Q; Su XH
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Jul; 95(1):189-99. PubMed ID: 22592554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inhibition analysis of inhibitors derived from lignocellulose pretreatment on the metabolic activity of Zymomonas mobilis biofilm and planktonic cells and the proteomic responses.
Todhanakasem T; Yodsanga S; Sowatad A; Kanokratana P; Thanonkeo P; Champreda V
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2018 Jan; 115(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 28892134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biotechnological strategies to overcome inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol production: review.
Parawira W; Tekere M
Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2011 Mar; 31(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 20513164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioabatement to remove inhibitors from biomass-derived sugar hydrolysates.
Nichols NN; Dien BS; Guisado GM; López MJ
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2005; 121-124():379-90. PubMed ID: 15917615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of a newly developed integrant of Zymomonas mobilis for ethanol production on corn stover hydrolysate.
Mohagheghi A; Dowe N; Schell D; Chou YC; Eddy C; Zhang M
Biotechnol Lett; 2004 Feb; 26(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15055769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of hfq and sigE on the tolerance of Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 to furfural and acetic acid stresses.
Nouri H; Moghimi H; Marashi SA; Elahi E
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240330. PubMed ID: 33035245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flocculating Zymomonas mobilis is a promising host to be engineered for fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass.
Zhao N; Bai Y; Liu CG; Zhao XQ; Xu JF; Bai FW
Biotechnol J; 2014 Mar; 9(3):362-71. PubMed ID: 24357469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-treatment step with Leuconostoc mesenteroides or L. pseudomesenteroides strains removes furfural from Zymomonas mobilis ethanolic fermentation broth.
Hunter WJ; Manter DK
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Oct; 169():162-168. PubMed ID: 25048957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolation of microorganisms for biological detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysates.
López MJ; Nichols NN; Dien BS; Moreno J; Bothast RJ
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 64(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 12908085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preparation and evaluation of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates for growth by ethanologenic yeasts.
Zha Y; Slomp R; van Groenestijn J; Punt PJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 834():245-59. PubMed ID: 22144364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of recycling stillage on conversion of dilute sulfuric acid pretreated corn stover to ethanol.
Mohagheghi A; Schell DJ
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Apr; 105(5):992-6. PubMed ID: 19998277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of bark on the fermentation of Douglas-fir whitewood pre-hydrolysates.
Robinson J; Keating JD; Boussaid A; Mansfield SD; Saddler JN
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 59(4-5):443-8. PubMed ID: 12172607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors.
Liu ZL
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 73(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17028874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High tolerance and physiological mechanism of Zymomonas mobilis to phenolic inhibitors in ethanol fermentation of corncob residue.
Gu H; Zhang J; Bao J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2015 Sep; 112(9):1770-82. PubMed ID: 25851269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of glucose/xylose cofermentation of poplar hydrolysates processed by different pretreatment technologies.
Lu Y; Warner R; Sedlak M; Ho N; Mosier NS
Biotechnol Prog; 2009; 25(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 19319980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alcoholic fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia stipitis and Zymomonas mobilis in the presence of inhibitory compounds and seawater.
Gonçalves FA; dos Santos ES; de Macedo GR
J Basic Microbiol; 2015 Jun; 55(6):695-708. PubMed ID: 25760943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of varying feedstock-pretreatment chemistry combinations on the formation and accumulation of potentially inhibitory degradation products in biomass hydrolysates.
Du B; Sharma LN; Becker C; Chen SF; Mowery RA; van Walsum GP; Chambliss CK
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Oct; 107(3):430-40. PubMed ID: 20552667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of a fast high pressure liquid chromatography method for the analysis of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis and fermentation products.
Scarlata CJ; Hyman DA
J Chromatogr A; 2010 Apr; 1217(14):2082-7. PubMed ID: 20202640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accounting for all sugars produced during integrated production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass.
Schell DJ; Dowe N; Chapeaux A; Nelson RS; Jennings EW
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Apr; 205():153-8. PubMed ID: 26826954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
