BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19683756)

  • 1. Pediatric urology and the internet--does an uncommon topic decrease content quality?
    Routh JC; Gong EM; Nelson CP
    J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1569-74. PubMed ID: 19683756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does a controversial topic affect the quality of urologic information on the Internet?
    Routh JC; Gong EM; Cannon GM; Nelson CP
    Urology; 2011 Nov; 78(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 21945281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of readability and quality of web pages addressing both common and uncommon topics in pediatric surgery.
    Adorisio O; Silveri M; Rivosecchi M; Tozzi AE; Scottoni F; Buonuomo PS
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2012 Jun; 22(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 22576301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.
    Thompson AE; Graydon SL
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Myelomeningocele information on the internet is accessible and of variable quality, and requires a high reading level.
    Bergman J; Konijeti R; Lerman SE
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17296433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cryptorchidism: the veracity of online information accessible to the public.
    Braunstein J; Afshar K; MacNeily AE
    J Pediatr Surg; 2007 Oct; 42(10):1745-8. PubMed ID: 17923207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient education through the Internet: academic and private practice sites.
    Rozental TD; Bozentka DJ; Beredjiklian PK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Apr; (421):50-3. PubMed ID: 15123925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surfing for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: perspectives on quality and content of information on the Internet.
    Stinson JN; Tucker L; Huber A; Harris H; Lin C; Cohen L; Gill N; Lukas-Bretzler J; Proulx L; Prowten D
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):1755-62. PubMed ID: 19531749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of information about kidney transplantation on the World Wide Web.
    Hanif F; Abayasekara K; Willcocks L; Jolly EC; Jamieson NV; Praseedom RK; Goodacre JA; Read JC; Chaudhry A; Gibbs P
    Clin Transplant; 2007; 21(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 17488387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analysis of cluster headache information provided on internet websites.
    Peterlin BL; Gambini-Suarez E; Lidicker J; Levin M
    Headache; 2008 Mar; 48(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 18005143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Analysis of paediatric neuro-oncological information on the Internet in German language].
    Bartels U; Hargrave D; Lau L; Esquembre C; Humpl T; Bouffet E
    Klin Padiatr; 2003; 215(6):352-7. PubMed ID: 14677102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critical evaluation of Web sites offering patient information on tinnitus.
    Kieran SM; Skinner LJ; Donnelly M; Smyth DA
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2010 Jan; 89(1):E11-4. PubMed ID: 20155682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of chronic pain websites.
    Washington TA; Fanciullo GJ; Sorensen JA; Baird JC
    Pain Med; 2008 Nov; 9(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 18346065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic internet-based review of complementary and alternative medicine for glaucoma.
    Gunasekera V; Ernst E; Ezra DG
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):435-439.e2. PubMed ID: 17900696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations.
    Yermilov I; Chow W; Devgan L; Makary MA; Ko CY
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Oct; 207(4):580-6. PubMed ID: 18926463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the quality and accuracy of information regarding aromatase inhibitors available on the internet.
    Beaton C; Codd RJ; Holland PA; Gateley CA
    Breast J; 2008; 14(4):366-8. PubMed ID: 18537915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology.
    Fast AM; Deibert CM; Hruby GW; Glassberg KI
    J Pediatr Urol; 2013 Apr; 9(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 22281281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of neuro-oncology information for French speaking patients on the Internet].
    Lévêque M; Dimitriu C; Gustin T; Jamart J; Gilliard C; Bojanowski MW
    Neurochirurgie; 2007 Nov; 53(5):343-55. PubMed ID: 17881014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostate cancer on the Internet--information or misinformation?
    Black PC; Penson DF
    J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1836-42; discussion 1842. PubMed ID: 16600774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of natural health products in treating osteoporosis: what is the quality of internet patient advice?
    Whelan AM; Jurgens TM; Bowles SK; Doyle H
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 May; 43(5):899-907. PubMed ID: 19417114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.