304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19684011)
61. The impact of cataract, cataract types, and cataract grades on vision-specific functioning using Rasch analysis.
Chew M; Chiang PP; Zheng Y; Lavanya R; Wu R; Saw SM; Wong TY; Lamoureux EL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; 154(1):29-38.e2. PubMed ID: 22541931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale'. A measure of visual functional status.
Mangione CM; Phillips RS; Seddon JM; Lawrence MG; Cook EF; Dailey R; Goldman L
Med Care; 1992 Dec; 30(12):1111-26. PubMed ID: 1453816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Glaucoma and quality of life: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation.
Freeman EE; Muñoz B; West SK; Jampel HD; Friedman DS
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 17655930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Psychometric Properties of the Vietnamese Catquest-9 Short Form Questionnaire.
To QG; Huynh VAN; Do DV; Do VQ; Congdon N; Dingle K; Hong HV; Nguyen HT; To KG
Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Mar; 97(3):192-197. PubMed ID: 32168242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Development of a questionnaire to assess vision problems under low luminance in age-related maculopathy.
Owsley C; McGwin G; Scilley K; Kallies K
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 16431946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Strabismus: A Modification of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis.
Gothwal VK; Bharani S; Kekunnaya R; Chhablani P; Sachdeva V; Pehere NK; Narasaiah A; Gunturu R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127064. PubMed ID: 26011430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Relationship between visual impairment and eye diseases and visual function in Andhra Pradesh.
Nutheti R; Keeffe JE; Shamanna BR; Nirmalan PK; Krishnaiah S; Thomas R
Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1552-7. PubMed ID: 17678693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Why measurement matters for measuring patient vision outcomes.
Mallinson T
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 17700332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. What do different visual function questionnaires measure?
Massof RW; Ahmadian L
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(4):198-204. PubMed ID: 17896298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Developing the impact of Vision Impairment-Very Low Vision (IVI-VLV) questionnaire as part of the LoVADA protocol.
Finger RP; Tellis B; Crewe J; Keeffe JE; Ayton LN; Guymer RH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 55(10):6150-8. PubMed ID: 25190656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Psychometric properties of the NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire in keratoconus.
McAlinden C; Khadka J; de Freitas Santos Paranhos J; Schor P; Pesudovs K
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7370-4. PubMed ID: 22997284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The Impact of Vision Impairment for Children (IVI_C): validation of a vision-specific pediatric quality-of-life questionnaire using Rasch analysis.
Cochrane GM; Marella M; Keeffe JE; Lamoureux EL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Mar; 52(3):1632-40. PubMed ID: 21178144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Activity outcome measurement for postacute care.
Haley SM; Coster WJ; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Ni P; Bond TL; Sinclair SJ; Jette AM
Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I49-61. PubMed ID: 14707755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Development of the 25-item Cardiff Visual Ability Questionnaire for Children (CVAQC).
Khadka J; Ryan B; Margrain TH; Court H; Woodhouse JM
Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 94(6):730-5. PubMed ID: 20508047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Rasch psychometric validation of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire in people with Parkinson's disease.
Franchignoni F; Ferriero G; Giordano A; Guglielmi V; Picco D
Eura Medicophys; 2007 Dec; 43(4):451-61. PubMed ID: 18084167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health.
Norquist JM; Fitzpatrick R; Dawson J; Jenkinson C
Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I25-36. PubMed ID: 14707753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Clinical research, comparison of the subjective visual function in patients with epiphora and patients with second-eye cataract.
Kafil-Hussain N; Khooshebah R
Orbit; 2005 Mar; 24(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 15764114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Validation of Catquest-9SF-A Visual Disability Instrument to Evaluate Patient Function After Corneal Transplantation.
Claesson M; Armitage WJ; Byström B; Montan P; Samolov B; Stenvi U; Lundström M
Cornea; 2017 Sep; 36(9):1083-1088. PubMed ID: 28777777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Visual function and subjective perception of visual ability after macular hole surgery.
Tranos PG; Ghazi-Nouri SM; Rubin GS; Adams ZC; Charteris DG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):995-1002. PubMed ID: 15629291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The impact of visual impairment and eye disease on vision-related quality of life in a Mexican-American population: proyecto VER.
Broman AT; Munoz B; Rodriguez J; Sanchez R; Quigley HA; Klein R; Snyder R; West SK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Nov; 43(11):3393-8. PubMed ID: 12407148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]