These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19684955)

  • 1. Comparative study of dental arch width in plaster models, photocopies and digitized images.
    Rosseto MC; Palma FM; Ferreira RI; Pinzan A; Vellini-Ferreira F
    Braz Oral Res; 2009; 23(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 19684955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping.
    Germec-Cakan D; Taner TU; Akan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. PubMed ID: 20685525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arch-width changes in extraction vs nonextraction treatments in matched Class I borderline malocclusions.
    Herzog C; Konstantonis D; Konstantoni N; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):735-743. PubMed ID: 28364897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside?
    Tavares A; Braga E; Araújo TM
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):68-73. PubMed ID: 29364382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longitudinal evaluation of dental arch asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion with 3-dimensional digital models.
    Veli I; Yuksel B; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):763-70. PubMed ID: 24880847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.
    Aksu M; Kocadereli I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):948-52. PubMed ID: 16448236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of dental arch width and form changes after orthodontic treatment and retention with a new computerized method.
    Taner TU; Ciger S; El H; Germeç D; Es A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Oct; 126(4):464-75; discussion 475-6. PubMed ID: 15470349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arch widths after extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.
    Golwalkar SA; Shetty V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):312-5. PubMed ID: 23811665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alveolar and dental arch morphology in Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Bălan RA; Popa G; Biţă R; Fabricky M; Jivănescu A; Bratu DC
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2014; 55(3 Suppl):1093-7. PubMed ID: 25607390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, class II division 1 and class II division 2.
    Uysal T; Memili B; Usumez S; Sari Z
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):941-7. PubMed ID: 16448235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Study on the dental arch width in Class II malocclusion].
    Xu JP; Shen PM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):597-600. PubMed ID: 16400487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Jelusic D; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 22051488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of the plaster casts of Class II division 1 non-extraction patients treated with Alexander technique].
    Cao T; Wei S; Zhou YH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 48(9):518-22. PubMed ID: 24314276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transverse dimensions of dental arches in subjects with Class II malocclusion in the early mixed dentition.
    Marinelli A; Mariotti M; Defraia E
    Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 21515229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Evaluation of Mandibular Dental and Basal Arch Dimensions in Class I and Class II Division 1 Adult Syrian Patients using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Al-Hilal LH; Sultan K; Hajeer MY; Mahmoud G; Wanli AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):431-437. PubMed ID: 29728549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class II Division 1 and Class I malocclusions.
    Ball RL; Miner RM; Will LA; Arai K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 20620832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.