These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19685274)

  • 1. Quantitative and qualitative models for carcinogenicity prediction for non-congeneric chemicals using CP ANN method for regulatory uses.
    Fjodorova N; Vračko M; Tušar M; Jezierska A; Novič M; Kühne R; Schüürmann G
    Mol Divers; 2010 Aug; 14(3):581-94. PubMed ID: 19685274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Counter propagation artificial neural network categorical models for prediction of carcinogenicity for non-congeneric chemicals.
    Fjodorova N; Vracko M; Jezierska A; Novic M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 20373214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some findings relevant to the mechanistic interpretation in the case of predictive models for carcinogenicity based on the counter propagation artificial neural network.
    Fjodorova N; Novič M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Dec; 25(12):1159-69. PubMed ID: 22139476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of QSAR and SAR methods for the mechanistic interpretation of predictive models for carcinogenicity.
    Fjodorova N; Novič M
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2012; 1():e201207003. PubMed ID: 24688639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the applicability domain in the case of classification predictive models for carcinogenicity based on the counter propagation artificial neural network.
    Fjodorova N; Novič M; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Dec; 25(12):1147-58. PubMed ID: 22139475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using molecular structural similarity and E-state indices.
    Contrera JF; Matthews EJ; Daniel Benz R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Dec; 38(3):243-59. PubMed ID: 14623477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New public QSAR model for carcinogenicity.
    Fjodorova N; Vracko M; Novic M; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
    Chem Cent J; 2010 Jul; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 20678182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting carcinogenicity of diverse chemicals using probabilistic neural network modeling approaches.
    Singh KP; Gupta S; Rai P
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 272(2):465-75. PubMed ID: 23856075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of criteria used to access carcinogenicity in CPANN QSAR models versus the knowledge-based expert system Toxtree.
    Fjodorova N; Novič M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(6):423-41. PubMed ID: 24716754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency.
    Venkatapathy R; Wang CY; Bruce RM; Moudgal C
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 18977375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB): results of animal bioassays published in the general literature in 1993 to 1994 and by the National Toxicology Program in 1995 to 1996.
    Gold LS; Manley NB; Slone TH; Rohrbach L
    Environ Health Perspect; 1999 Aug; 107 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):527-600. PubMed ID: 10421768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.
    Lagunin AA; Dearden JC; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
    Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 586(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16112600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of QSAR models for predicting hepatocarcinogenic toxicity of chemicals.
    Massarelli I; Imbriani M; Coi A; Saraceno M; Carli N; Bianucci AM
    Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 44(9):3658-64. PubMed ID: 19272677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of carcinogenicity for diverse chemicals based on substructure grouping and SVM modeling.
    Tanabe K; Lučić B; Amić D; Kurita T; Kaihara M; Onodera N; Suzuki T
    Mol Divers; 2010 Nov; 14(4):789-802. PubMed ID: 20186479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.
    Osimitz TG; Droege W; Boobis AR; Lake BG
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 60():550-62. PubMed ID: 23954551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative structure-carcinogenicity relationship for detecting structural alerts in nitroso compounds: species, rat; sex, female; route of administration, gavage.
    Morales Helguera A; Pérez González M; Dias Soeiro Cordeiro MN; Cabrera Pérez MA
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 21(3):633-42. PubMed ID: 18293904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First report on development of quantitative interspecies structure-carcinogenicity relationship models and exploring discriminatory features for rodent carcinogenicity of diverse organic chemicals using OECD guidelines.
    Kar S; Roy K
    Chemosphere; 2012 Apr; 87(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 22225702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity of aromatic amines: a quantitative structure-activity relationships model.
    Franke R; Gruska A; Giuliani A; Benigni R
    Carcinogenesis; 2001 Sep; 22(9):1561-71. PubMed ID: 11532881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of predictive models for nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity using both toxicogenomics and quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Liu Z; Kelly R; Fang H; Ding D; Tong W
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 24(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 21627106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.