These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19685924)

  • 21. Novel technologies for virtual screening.
    Lengauer T; Lemmen C; Rarey M; Zimmermann M
    Drug Discov Today; 2004 Jan; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 14761803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. FLEXS: a method for fast flexible ligand superposition.
    Lemmen C; Lengauer T; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 1998 Nov; 41(23):4502-20. PubMed ID: 9804690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Virtual screening and scaffold hopping based on GRID molecular interaction fields.
    Ahlström MM; Ridderström M; Luthman K; Zamora I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 16180908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring.
    Zhang Q; Muegge I
    J Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 49(5):1536-48. PubMed ID: 16509572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Similarity search profiles as a diagnostic tool for the analysis of virtual screening calculations.
    Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(4):1275-81. PubMed ID: 15272835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Considerations in compound database preparation--"hidden" impact on virtual screening results.
    Knox AJ; Meegan MJ; Carta G; Lloyd DG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1908-19. PubMed ID: 16309298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring polypharmacology using a ROCS-based target fishing approach.
    AbdulHameed MD; Chaudhury S; Singh N; Sun H; Wallqvist A; Tawa GJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):492-505. PubMed ID: 22196353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Virtual screening for R-groups, including predicted pIC50 contributions, within large structural databases, using Topomer CoMFA.
    Cramer RD; Cruz P; Stahl G; Curtiss WC; Campbell B; Masek BB; Soltanshahi F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2180-95. PubMed ID: 18956863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of ligand-based tautomer and protomer prediction on structure-based virtual screening.
    Kalliokoski T; Salo HS; Lahtela-Kakkonen M; Poso A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2742-8. PubMed ID: 19928753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. FLAP: GRID molecular interaction fields in virtual screening. validation using the DUD data set.
    Cross S; Baroni M; Carosati E; Benedetti P; Clementi S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Aug; 50(8):1442-50. PubMed ID: 20690627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Virtual drug screen schema based on multiview similarity integration and ranking aggregation.
    Kang H; Sheng Z; Zhu R; Huang Q; Liu Q; Cao Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):834-43. PubMed ID: 22332590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Structure-based virtual screening protocols.
    Good A
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2001 May; 4(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 11560062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimization of high throughput virtual screening by combining shape-matching and docking methods.
    Lee HS; Choi J; Kufareva I; Abagyan R; Filikov A; Yang Y; Yoon S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 18302357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of topological, shape, and docking methods in virtual screening.
    McGaughey GB; Sheridan RP; Bayly CI; Culberson JC; Kreatsoulas C; Lindsley S; Maiorov V; Truchon JF; Cornell WD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1504-19. PubMed ID: 17591764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3256-66. PubMed ID: 15534703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electron density fingerprints (EDprints): virtual screening using assembled information of electron density.
    Kooistra AJ; Binsl TW; van Beek JH; de Graaf C; Heringa J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Oct; 50(10):1772-80. PubMed ID: 20839826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A 3D similarity method for scaffold hopping from known drugs or natural ligands to new chemotypes.
    Jenkins JL; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(25):6144-59. PubMed ID: 15566286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand complexes: enrichment of known inhibitors in large-scale virtual screening.
    Huang N; Kalyanaraman C; Irwin JJ; Jacobson MP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):243-53. PubMed ID: 16426060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.