These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19685970)

  • 1. Further analysis of perception of the standard Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens): effects of length of brackets.
    Nakamura N; Watanabe S; Fujita K
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 19685970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Nakamura N; Fujita K; Ushitani T; Miyata H
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 16893262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Further analysis of perception of reversed Müller-Lyer figures for pigeons (Columba livia).
    Nakamura N; Watanabe S; Fujita K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Feb; 108(1):239-50. PubMed ID: 19425465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Suganuma E; Pessoa VF; Monge-Fuentes V; Castro BM; Tavares MC
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 182(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 17586063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pigeons perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion.
    Watanabe S; Nakamura N; Fujita K
    Cognition; 2011 Apr; 119(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 21109240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pigeons perceive the Ebbinghaus-Titchener circles as an assimilation illusion.
    Nakamura N; Watanabe S; Fujita K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jul; 34(3):375-87. PubMed ID: 18665720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Framing effects and the reversed Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Sep; 52(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 1408641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: II. Strategic information search in humans (Homo sapiens) but not in pigeons (Columba livia).
    Lea SE; Wills AJ; Leaver LA; Ryan CM; Bryant CM; Millar L
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):406-20. PubMed ID: 19929109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).
    Makino H; Jitsumori M
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inaccurate feedback and performance on the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Brosvic GM; Finizio S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 1):896-8. PubMed ID: 7567409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential effects of visual context on pattern discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Kelly DM; Cook RG
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Jun; 117(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 12856790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Illusions within an Illusion.
    Deręgowski JB
    Perception; 2015 Dec; 44(12):1416-21. PubMed ID: 26562856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reversed Müller-Lyer illusion and figure-ground organization theory.
    Taya R; Ohashi Y
    Perception; 1992; 21(5):611-26. PubMed ID: 1488264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The influence of geometric visual illusions on saccadic eye movements].
    Tegetmeyer H; Wenger A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 16418941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal-detection analysis of the Müller-Lyer and the Horizontal-Vertical illusions.
    Brosvic GM; Civale NA; Long P; Kieley D; Kristoff K; Memblatt N; Gordon R; Parris L; Giambelluca C; Dihoff RE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Dec; 79(3 Pt 1):1299-304. PubMed ID: 7899013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Length illusions in conventional and single-wing Müller-Lyer stimuli.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):1086-98. PubMed ID: 10997051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Length illusion in fractional Müller-Lyer stimuli: an object-perception approach.
    Redding GM; Hawley E
    Perception; 1993; 22(7):819-28. PubMed ID: 8115239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of grouping abilities in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio) with the Ebbinghaus illusion.
    Parron C; Fagot J
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Nov; 121(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 18085924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between perceived length and egocentric location in Müller-Lyer figures with one versus two chevrons.
    Welch RB; Post RB; Lum W; Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1095-104. PubMed ID: 15751468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.