These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Inferences about the location of food in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in two sensory modalities. Sabbatini G; Visalberghi E J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 18489231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inferential reasoning by exclusion in children (Homo sapiens). Hill A; Collier-Baker E; Suddendorf T J Comp Psychol; 2012 Aug; 126(3):243-54. PubMed ID: 21728410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use positive, but not negative, auditory cues to infer food location. Heimbauer LA; Antworth RL; Owren MJ Anim Cogn; 2012 Jan; 15(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 21681475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) spontaneously use visual but not acoustic information to find hidden food items. Paukner A; Huntsberry ME; Suomi SJ J Comp Psychol; 2009 Feb; 123(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19236142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task. Mulcahy NJ; Call J J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 19685972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human analog tests of the sixth stage of object permanence. Heishman M; Conant M; Pasnak R Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 2):1059-68. PubMed ID: 7478858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of human visual attention cues by olive baboons (Papio anubis) in a competitive task. Vick SJ; Anderson JR J Comp Psychol; 2003 Jun; 117(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12856791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inferential reasoning by exclusion in great apes, lesser apes, and spider monkeys. Hill A; Collier-Baker E; Suddendorf T J Comp Psychol; 2011 Feb; 125(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 21341913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Socioeconomic status differences in children's discrimination learning as related to the reward and information functions of response-contingent stimuli. Eley MG Child Dev; 1974 Sep; 45(3):834-8. PubMed ID: 4143840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Inferences about the location of food in lemurs (Eulemur macaco and Eulemur fulvus): a comparison with apes and monkeys. Maille A; Roeder JJ Anim Cogn; 2012 Nov; 15(6):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22806271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment. Banta Lavenex P; Lavenex P Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 19800920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferences about food location in three cercopithecine species: an insight into the socioecological cognition of primates. Petit O; Dufour V; Herrenschmidt M; De Marco A; Sterck EH; Call J Anim Cogn; 2015 Jul; 18(4):821-30. PubMed ID: 25697970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Domestic pigs' (Sus scrofa domestica) use of direct and indirect visual and auditory cues in an object choice task. Nawroth C; von Borell E Anim Cogn; 2015 May; 18(3):757-66. PubMed ID: 25650328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Object discrimination learning in aged Japanese monkeys. Itoh K; Izumi A; Kojima S Behav Neurosci; 2001 Apr; 115(2):259-70. PubMed ID: 11345953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]