These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19685997)

  • 1. Contrast effects in priming paradigms: Implications for theory and research on implicit attitudes.
    Scherer LD; Lambert AJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 97(3):383-403. PubMed ID: 19685997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S; Finkelshtein A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 20952778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning.
    Stahl C; Unkelbach C; Corneille O
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 97(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 19685998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities.
    Goschke T; Bolte A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):394-406. PubMed ID: 17352620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response priming patterns differ with interstimulus interval duration.
    Spencer KA; Wiley E
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Jun; 22(6):475-90. PubMed ID: 18484286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contextual influences on implicit evaluation: a test of additive versus contrastive effects of evaluative context stimuli in affective priming.
    Gawronski B; Deutsch R; Seidel O
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1226-36. PubMed ID: 16055642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anchors aweigh: a demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming.
    Oppenheimer DM; LeBoeuf RA; Brewer NT
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 17286970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming.
    Rothermund K; Wentura D; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):482-95. PubMed ID: 15910132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment.
    Förster J; Liberman N; Kuschel S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):579-99. PubMed ID: 18361673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.
    Rogers TT; Lambon Ralph MA; Garrard P; Bozeat S; McClelland JL; Hodges JR; Patterson K
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):205-35. PubMed ID: 14756594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.
    Perlman A; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 16478345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adult aging effects on semantic and episodic priming in word recognition.
    Laver GD
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 19290735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1417-40. PubMed ID: 19045983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition.
    Ma Y; Han S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):619-33. PubMed ID: 20515192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What antipriming reveals about priming.
    Marsolek CJ
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 May; 12(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 18403251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement.
    Payne BK; Cheng CM; Govorun O; Stewart BD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Sep; 89(3):277-93. PubMed ID: 16248714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter search does not affect semantic priming in a probe naming task.
    Küper K; Heil M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 18834963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forming implicit and explicit attitudes toward individuals: social group association cues.
    McConnell AR; Rydell RJ; Strain LM; Mackie DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 May; 94(5):792-807. PubMed ID: 18444739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: preferential attention without implicit valence.
    Purkis HM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):314-23. PubMed ID: 17516810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.