159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19686004)
1. When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT).
Quirin M; Kazén M; Kuhl J
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 97(3):500-16. PubMed ID: 19686004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [An attempt to construct a Japanese version of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)].
Shimoda S; Okubo N; Kobayashi M; Sato S; Kitamura H
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2014 Aug; 85(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 25272447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Spanish adaptation of the implicit positive and negative affect test (IPANAT).
Hernández GP; Rovira T; Quirin M; Edo S
Psicothema; 2020 May; 32(2):268-274. PubMed ID: 32249754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Criterion Validity of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test: Prediction of Facial Affect Perception.
Weil AS; Günther V; Schmidt FM; Kersting A; Quirin M; Suslow T
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():635368. PubMed ID: 34658987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Brief Version of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT-18).
Hernández GP; Edo S; Quirin M; Rovira T
Psychol Belg; 2020 Sep; 60(1):315-327. PubMed ID: 32983549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality.
Back MD; Schmukle SC; Egloff B
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 97(3):533-48. PubMed ID: 19686006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of adolescents' learned helplessness in achievement situations.
Reynolds WM; Miller KL
J Pers Assess; 1989; 53(2):211-28. PubMed ID: 2724038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implicit but not explicit affectivity predicts circadian and reactive cortisol: using the implicit positive and negative affect test.
Quirin M; Kazén M; Rohrmann S; Kuhl J
J Pers; 2009 Apr; 77(2):401-25. PubMed ID: 19192075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric Evaluation of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test in Turkish Samples.
Peker M; Meşe G; Cem Ersoy N
Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2021; 32(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 34181743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are implicit and explicit motive measures statistically independent? A fair and balanced test using the picture story exercise and a cue- and response-matched questionnaire measure.
Schultheiss OC; Yankova D; Dirlikov B; Schad DJ
J Pers Assess; 2009 Jan; 91(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 19085286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recovering from negative events by boosting implicit positive affect.
Quirin M; Bode RC; Kuhl J
Cogn Emot; 2011 Apr; 25(3):559-70. PubMed ID: 21432694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The increased construct validity and clinical utility of assessing relationship quality using separate positive and negative dimensions.
Mattson RE; Paldino D; Johnson MD
Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 17371129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test: Validity and Relationship with Cardiovascular Stress-Responses.
van der Ploeg MM; Brosschot JF; Thayer JF; Verkuil B
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():425. PubMed ID: 27065908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures.
Chernyshenko OS; Stark S; Drasgow F; Roberts BW
Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):88-106. PubMed ID: 17371125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: the blind men and the elephant revisited?
Bosson JK; Swann WB; Pennebaker JW
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Oct; 79(4):631-43. PubMed ID: 11045743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Happiness and memory: affective significance of endowment and contrast.
Liberman V; Boehm JK; Lyubomirsky S; Ross LD
Emotion; 2009 Oct; 9(5):666-80. PubMed ID: 19803589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construct validity and vulnerability to anxiety: a cognitive interviewing study of the revised Anxiety Sensitivity Index.
Brown GP; Hawkes NC; Tata P
J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Oct; 23(7):942-9. PubMed ID: 19586752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The validity of well-being measures: a multiple-indicator-multiple-rater model.
Zou C; Schimmack U; Gere J
Psychol Assess; 2013 Dec; 25(4):1247-54. PubMed ID: 23914958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
Greenwald AG; Poehlman TA; Uhlmann EL; Banaji MR
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jul; 97(1):17-41. PubMed ID: 19586237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting alcohol use with a recoding-free variant of the Implicit Association Test.
Houben K; Rothermund K; Wiers RW
Addict Behav; 2009 May; 34(5):487-9. PubMed ID: 19162409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
