These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19686024)

  • 1. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Logic, beliefs, and instruction: a test of the default interventionist account of belief bias.
    Handley SJ; Newstead SE; Trippas D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 21058879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process.
    Hayes BK; Stephens RG; Ngo J; Dunn JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1333-1351. PubMed ID: 29389195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A test of two processes: The effect of training on deductive and inductive reasoning.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK; Kalish ML
    Cognition; 2020 Jun; 199():104223. PubMed ID: 32092549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The probability heuristics model of syllogistic reasoning.
    Chater N; Oaksford M
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Mar; 38(2):191-258. PubMed ID: 10090803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomy of deductive reasoning.
    Goel V
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Oct; 11(10):435-41. PubMed ID: 17913567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The macrostructure of informal arguments: a proposed model and analysis.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):1021-51. PubMed ID: 12881169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quantitative causal model theory of conditional reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Erb CD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1327-43. PubMed ID: 23565785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are there two processes in reasoning? The dimensionality of inductive and deductive inferences.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Mar; 125(2):218-244. PubMed ID: 29265853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two kinds of reasoning.
    Rips LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11340921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New Evidence for Distinct Right and Left Brain Systems for Deductive versus Probabilistic Reasoning.
    Parsons LM; Osherson D
    Cereb Cortex; 2001 Oct; 11(10):954-65. PubMed ID: 11549618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of arguments in research reports].
    Botes A
    Curationis; 1999 Jun; 22(2):10-9. PubMed ID: 11040614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A reasoning bias revealed by electrodermal activity.
    Carbonnell L; Vidal F; Sequeira H; Caverni JP
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Jul; 43(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 16916435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theories of the syllogism: A meta-analysis.
    Khemlani S; Johnson-Laird PN
    Psychol Bull; 2012 May; 138(3):427-57. PubMed ID: 22289108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Popper and the problem of induction in epidemiology].
    Banegas JR; Rodríguez Artalejo F; del Rey Calero J
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000; 74(4):327-39. PubMed ID: 11031841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mental models and logical reasoning problems in the GRE.
    Yang Y; Johnson-Laird PN
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Dec; 7(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 11838893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When fast logic meets slow belief: Evidence for a parallel-processing model of belief bias.
    Trippas D; Thompson VA; Handley SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):539-552. PubMed ID: 28028779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.