304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19686025)
1. Category-based errors and the accessibility of unbiased spatial memories: a retrieval model.
Sampaio C; Wang RF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1331-7. PubMed ID: 19686025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A category adjustment approach to memory for spatial location in natural scenes.
Holden MP; Curby KM; Newcombe NS; Shipley TF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):590-604. PubMed ID: 20438259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias in spatial memory: a categorical endorsement.
Haun DB; Allen GL; Wedell DH
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):149-70. PubMed ID: 15627414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time.
Schreij D; Olivers CN
Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19682674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.
Criss AH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):484-99. PubMed ID: 20192544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
Vergauwe E; Barrouillet P; Camos V
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1012-28. PubMed ID: 19586267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vertical scanning biases and their possible influence on reading direction: celtic wisdom or folly?
Amengual AM; Drago V; Foster PS; Leiguarda RC; Heilman KM
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jan; 14(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18078536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-resolution ERP mapping of cortical activation related to implicit object-location memory.
Murphy JS; Wynne CE; O'Rourke EM; Commins S; Roche RA
Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 19683556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direction specific costs to spatial working memory from saccadic and spatial remapping.
Vasquez B; Danckert J
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2344-54. PubMed ID: 18440036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Categorical and coordinate spatial representations within object-location memory.
van Asselen M; Kessels RP; Kappelle LJ; Postma A
Cortex; 2008 Mar; 44(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 18387555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
De Goede M; Postma A
Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for intact selective attention in Alzheimer's disease patients using a location priming task.
Ko PC; Kilduff PT; Higgens JA; Milberg W; McGlinchey R
Neuropsychology; 2005 May; 19(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 15910124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lateralized effects of categorical and coordinate spatial processing of component parts on the recognition of 3D non-nameable objects.
Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 19800727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual similarity in short-term recall for where and when.
Jalbert A; Saint-Aubin J; Tremblay S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 17943647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eye movements and prospective memory: what the eyes can tell us about prospective memory.
West R; Carlson L; Cohen AL
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jun; 64(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 17112615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The planning of a sequence of saccades in pro- and antisaccade tasks: influence of visual integration time and concurrent motor processing.
Lavergne L; Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Orriols E; Doré-Mazars K
Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():82-95. PubMed ID: 18929544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Where do you think you are? Effects of conceptual current position on spatial memory performance.
Shelton AL; Marchette SA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):686-98. PubMed ID: 20438266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
