These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19686026)

  • 1. Attributing study effort to data-driven and goal-driven effects: implications for metacognitive judgments.
    Koriat A; Nussinson R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1338-43. PubMed ID: 19686026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judgments of learning depend on how learners interpret study effort.
    Koriat A; Nussinson R; Ackerman R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1624-37. PubMed ID: 24707787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of goal-driven and data-driven regulation on metacognitive monitoring during learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Adiv S; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):386-403. PubMed ID: 23421442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metacognition and mindreading: judgments of learning for Self and Other during self-paced study.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):251-64. PubMed ID: 20096606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Nussinson R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):36-69. PubMed ID: 16478315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring.
    Scheck P; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 15702968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition.
    Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preserved memory monitoring but impaired memory control during episodic encoding in patients with schizophrenia.
    Bacon E; Izaute M; Danion JM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Mar; 13(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 17286879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judgments of learning as memory modifiers.
    Soderstrom NC; Clark CT; Halamish V; Bjork EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):553-8. PubMed ID: 25528101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aging, encoding fluency, and metacognitive monitoring.
    Emanuel Robinson A; Hertzog C; Dunlosky J
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):458-78. PubMed ID: 16887783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.
    Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the difficulty of prior items on the magnitude of judgments of learning for subsequent items.
    Richards RM; Nelson TO
    Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 15058858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.