These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19686026)

  • 21. Appraisal-driven somatovisceral response patterning: effects of intrinsic pleasantness and goal conduciveness.
    Aue T; Scherer KR
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18495321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Normative multitrial recall performance, metacognitive judgments, and retrieval latencies for Lithuanian-English paired associates.
    Grimaldi PJ; Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):634-42. PubMed ID: 20805585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Embodiment meets metamemory: weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments.
    Alban MW; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1628-34. PubMed ID: 23565793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment.
    Ackerman R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1349-68. PubMed ID: 24364687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Metacognitive control and the spacing effect.
    Son LK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):255-62. PubMed ID: 20053063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Metacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.
    Wojcik DZ; Waterman AH; Lestié C; Moulin CJ; Souchay C
    Autism; 2014 May; 18(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 24151127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.
    Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).
    Nelson TO; Narens L; Dunlosky J
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 15053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect.
    Finn B; Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):238-44. PubMed ID: 17201565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Own-other differences in the realism of some metacognitive judgments.
    Johansson M; Allwood CM
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 17257365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Test-enhanced learning of natural concepts: effects on recognition memory, classification, and metacognition.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN; Coane JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1441-51. PubMed ID: 20804279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of metacognitive experiences in the learning process.
    Efklides A
    Psicothema; 2009 Feb; 21(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 19178860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic.
    Hilbig BE; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1296-305. PubMed ID: 19686022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring.
    Ariel R; Dunlosky J; Bailey H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):432-47. PubMed ID: 19653800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An investigation of increases in metamemory confidence across multiple study trials.
    Tiede HL; Derksen C; Leboe JP
    Memory; 2009 Apr; 17(3):288-300. PubMed ID: 19169925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Process demands of rejection mechanisms of recognition memory.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD; Gama JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1296-304. PubMed ID: 18763906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition.
    Jang Y; Wallsten TS; Huber DE
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):186-200. PubMed ID: 22059901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.