BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

731 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19686032)

  • 1. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equivalency of reaction times for simple and primed tasks.
    Hart MA; Reeve TG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 17055991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The interplay of stop signal inhibition and inhibition of return.
    Taylor TL; Ivanoff J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1349-71. PubMed ID: 14578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition.
    Ramautar JR; Slagter HA; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 16616048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-stop-signal adjustments: inhibition improves subsequent inhibition.
    Bissett PG; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):955-66. PubMed ID: 22268912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention for action during error correction.
    Sharika KM; Ray S; Murthy A
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():227-44. PubMed ID: 19733760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two types of action error: electrophysiological evidence for separable inhibitory and sustained attention neural mechanisms producing error on go/no-go tasks.
    O'Connell RG; Dockree PM; Bellgrove MA; Turin A; Ward S; Foxe JJ; Robertson IH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 18476764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.
    Huizinga M; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):484-503. PubMed ID: 21092983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term aftereffects of response inhibition: memory retrieval, task goals, and cognitive control.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1229-35. PubMed ID: 18823207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Context influences on the preparation and execution of reaching movements.
    Mirabella G; Pani P; Ferraina S
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):996-1010. PubMed ID: 19378414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensory MEG responses predict successful and failed inhibition in a stop-signal task.
    Boehler CN; Münte TF; Krebs RM; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 18440947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18608658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Congruency reversals in an accessory signal Simon task with auditory and visual stimuli.
    Soetens E; Maetens K; Zeischka P; Henderickx D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20451168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pure electrophysiology of stopping.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Hoeksma MR; Talsma D; Verbaten MN
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Feb; 55(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15649550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of goal representation in preschoolers' flexibility and inhibition.
    Blaye A; Chevalier N
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):469-83. PubMed ID: 21122878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociating neural indices of dynamic cognitive control in advance task-set preparation: an ERP study of task switching.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1125(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 17087918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Error-related negativity in a visual go/no-go task: children vs. adults.
    Kim EY; Iwaki N; Imashioya H; Uno H; Fujita T
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2007; 31(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 17488215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.