These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

734 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19686032)

  • 21. Brief report: manipulation of task difficulty in inhibitory control tasks.
    Lindqvist S; Thorell LB
    Child Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 15(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18608218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An interfering Go/No-go task does not affect accuracy in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Apr; 68(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 18180065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Mar; 87(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 14972598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Functional dissociation in right inferior frontal cortex during performance of go/no-go task.
    Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Asari T; Yamashita K; Morimoto H; Hirose S; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 18445602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies.
    Best M; Lawrence NS; Logan GD; McLaren IP; Verbruggen F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):115-37. PubMed ID: 26322688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Count me in! On the automaticity of numerosity processing.
    Naparstek S; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1053-9. PubMed ID: 20565221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated.
    Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):234-52. PubMed ID: 15518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A "gap effect" on stop signal reaction times in a human saccadic countermanding task.
    Stevenson SA; Elsley JK; Corneil BD
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 101(2):580-90. PubMed ID: 19019975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How to stop and change a response: the role of goal activation in multitasking.
    Verbruggen F; Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1212-28. PubMed ID: 18823206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Warning signals induce automatic EMG activations and proactive volitional inhibition: evidence from analysis of error distribution in simple RT.
    Boulinguez P; Jaffard M; Granjon L; Benraiss A
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 99(3):1572-8. PubMed ID: 18171709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Go-no-go performance in pathological gamblers.
    Kertzman S; Lowengrub K; Aizer A; Vainder M; Kotler M; Dannon PN
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Oct; 161(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18789539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Shifting development in mid-childhood: the influence of between-task interference.
    Cragg L; Nation K
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Sep; 45(5):1465-79. PubMed ID: 19702406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Elimination of the enhanced Simon effect for older adults in a three-choice situation: ageing and the Simon effect in a go/no-go Simon task.
    Kubo-Kawai N; Kawai N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):452-64. PubMed ID: 19575334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Notebaert W; Vandierendonck A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 15993830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetics, prefrontal cortex, and cognitive control: a twin study of event-related brain potentials in a response inhibition task.
    Anokhin AP; Heath AC; Myers E
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Sep; 368(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 15364418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accounting for cognitive aging: context processing, inhibition or processing speed?
    Rush BK; Barch DM; Braver TS
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):588-610. PubMed ID: 16887791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of attentional processes in ADHD and normal children.
    Gupta R; Kar BR
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():259-76. PubMed ID: 19733762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stimulus-based priming of task choice during voluntary task switching.
    Arrington CM; Weaver SM; Pauker RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 20565222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Negative priming in a numerical Piaget-like task as evidenced by ERP.
    Daurignac E; Houdé O; Jouvent R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):730-6. PubMed ID: 16768373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Working memory capacity and go/no-go task performance: selective effects of updating, maintenance, and inhibition.
    Redick TS; Calvo A; Gay CE; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):308-24. PubMed ID: 21299326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.