These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19687148)

  • 21. Determining the sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible: a cephalometric analysis to clear up the confusion.
    Davis GS; Cannon JL; Messersmith ML
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2013; 93(1):22-8; quiz 29-30. PubMed ID: 23909085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Wits" appraisal in southern Chinese children.
    So LL; Davis PJ; King NM
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2316903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians".
    Ifesanya JU; Adeyemi AT; Otuyemi OD
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 43(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 26223140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does hyoid bone resection according to Sistrunk influence normal craniofacial growth? A cephalometric study.
    Joss-Vassalli IM; Joss CU; Gebauer U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2275-82. PubMed ID: 19761923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Occlusal alterations in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis.
    Pelo S; Marianetti TM; Cacucci L; Di Nardo F; Borrelli A; Di Rocco C; Tamburrini G; Moro A; Gasparini G; Deli R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 21466946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.
    Chandra PK; Godfrey K
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2152434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of pharyngeal airway space amongst different skeletal patterns.
    Alves M; Franzotti ES; Baratieri C; Nunes LK; Nojima LI; Ruellas AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 41(7):814-9. PubMed ID: 22365893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal jaw base relationship prior to orthognathic surgery: the role of anterior cranial base inclination.
    Jünger TH; Ruf S; Eisfeld J; Howaldt HP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 11307186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella-nasion line. Changes in porion and orbitale position during growth.
    Greiner P; Müller B; Dibbets J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 May; 65(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15160248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects.
    Alkofide EA
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 17693429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of cephalometric measurements: a picture archiving and communication system versus the hand-tracing method--a preliminary study.
    Singh P; Davies TI
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 20923935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What skeletal and dental characteristics do TMD patients have in common?
    Phillips JT
    Funct Orthod; 2007; 24(1):24-6, 28, 30. PubMed ID: 17402385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
    Thayer TA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia GM
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10534977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics.
    da Silveira HL; Silveira HE
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 16637717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variation in dentofacial morphology and occlusion in juvenile idiopathic arthritis subjects: a case-control study.
    Hu Y; Billiau AD; Verdonck A; Wouters C; Carels C
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 19164412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.