127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19688027)
1. A retrospective randomized study to compare the energy delivered using CDE with different techniques and OZil settings by different surgeons in phacoemulsification.
Chen M; Sweeney HW; Luke B; Chen M; Brown M
Clin Ophthalmol; 2009; 3():401-3. PubMed ID: 19688027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) in Three Phaco-Fragmentation Techniques for Dense Cataract Removal.
Fernández-Muñoz E; Chávez-Romero Y; Rivero-Gómez R; Aridjis R; Gonzalez-Salinas R
Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():2405-2412. PubMed ID: 37605764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
Park J; Yum HR; Kim MS; Harrison AR; Kim EC
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
Gigliola S; Sborgia G; Niro A; Palmisano C; Puzo P; Giuliani G; Sborgia L; Sisto D; Pastore V; Furino C; Donghia R; Sborgia A; Boscia F; Alessio G
Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(12):1868-1875. PubMed ID: 34926201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of Balanced Torsional Phacoemulsification Tip for Cataract Surgery.
Sabur H; Eroglu SA; Azarsiz SS
J Curr Ophthalmol; 2022; 34(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 35620374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phaco-Chop versus Divide-and-Conquer in Patients Who Underwent Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Guedes J; Pereira SF; Amaral DC; Hespanhol LC; Faneli AC; Oliveira RDC; Mora-Paez DJ; Fontes BM
Clin Ophthalmol; 2024; 18():1535-1546. PubMed ID: 38827775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of CDE data in phacoemulsification between an open hospital-based ambulatory surgical center and a free-standing ambulatory surgical center.
Chen M; Chen M
Clin Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 4():1287-9. PubMed ID: 21151334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scoop and chop - A modified phaco-chop technique for pseudoexfoliation and cataract.
Rao A; Sahay P; Das G; Sarangi S; Padhy D
Oman J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 32792799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ozil IP torsional mode versus combined torsional/longitudinal microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
Helvacioglu F; Tunc Z; Yeter C; Oguzhan H; Sencan S
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(6):936-42. PubMed ID: 22427146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between endothelial cell loss and microcoaxial phacoemulsification parameters in noncomplicated cataract surgery.
Mahdy MA; Eid MZ; Mohammed MA; Hafez A; Bhatia J
Clin Ophthalmol; 2012; 6():503-10. PubMed ID: 22536044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two popular nuclear disassembly techniques for cataract surgeons in training: divide and conquer versus stop and chop.
Coppola M; Marchese A; Rabiolo A; Cicinelli MV; Knutsson KA
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 39(9):2097-2102. PubMed ID: 30465292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Computer-assisted phacoemulsification for hard cataracts].
Zemba M; Papadatu AC; Sîrbu LN; Avram C
Oftalmologia; 2012; 56(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 23755523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping.
Miyamoto N; Kiritoshi S; Akamime R; Akimoto M
Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 41(9):3081-3086. PubMed ID: 33948807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can we improve the efficacy of modern cataract surgery by using different tip designs? A comparison of balanced and tapered tip in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and manual phacoemulsification.
Pahlitzsch M; Pahlitzsch ML; Sumarni U; Pahlitzsch T
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 46(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 28563995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined 30-degree bevel up and down technique against 0-degree phaco tip for phacoemulsification surgery of hard cataracts.
Joshi RS; Muley SJ
Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():1073-1079. PubMed ID: 28652692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems.
Chen M; Anderson E; Hill G; Chen JJ; Patrianakos T
Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1367-72. PubMed ID: 26229430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pseudoexfoliative Syndrome in Cataract Surgery-A Quality Register Study and Health Economic Analysis in the Split-Dalmatia County, Croatia.
Borjan I; Stanić R; Pleština-Borjan I; Pavić M; Hertzberg SNW; Znaor L; Petrovski BÉ; Petrovski G
J Clin Med; 2023 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 38202045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 45-degree Kelman and 45-degree balanced phaco tip designs in torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
Demircan S; Ataş M; Göktaş E; Başkan B
Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(6):1168-72. PubMed ID: 26682167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two different ultrasound methods of phacoemulsification.
Helvacioglu F; Yeter C; Sencan S; Tunc Z; Uyar OM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 158(2):221-226.e1. PubMed ID: 24792106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of IOP based infusion system with and without balanced phaco tip on cumulative dissipated energy and estimated fluid usage in comparison to gravity fed infusion in torsional phacoemulsification.
Malik PK; Dewan T; Patidar AK; Sain E
Eye Vis (Lond); 2017; 4():22. PubMed ID: 28932753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
