146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19688219)
1. The digital atlas of skeletal maturity by Gilsanz and Ratib: a suitable alternative for age estimation of living individuals in criminal proceedings?
Schmidt S; Nitz I; Schulz R; Tsokos M; Schmeling A
Int J Legal Med; 2009 Nov; 123(6):489-94. PubMed ID: 19688219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Studies in use of the Greulich-Pyle skeletal age method to assess criminal liability.
Schmidt S; Koch B; Schulz R; Reisinger W; Schmeling A
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2008 Jul; 10(4):190-5. PubMed ID: 18331810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applicability of the skeletal age determination method of Tanner and Whitehouse for forensic age diagnostics.
Schmidt S; Nitz I; Schulz R; Schmeling A
Int J Legal Med; 2008 Jul; 122(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 18458930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skeletal age determination of the hand: a comparison of methods.
Schmidt S; Nitz I; Ribbecke S; Schulz R; Pfeiffer H; Schmeling A
Int J Legal Med; 2013 May; 127(3):691-8. PubMed ID: 23483207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of Gilsanz-Ratib digital atlas and Greulich-Pyle atlas for bone age estimation in a Chinese sample.
Lin FQ; Zhang J; Zhu Z; Wu YM
Ann Hum Biol; 2015; 42(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 25390184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The applicability of Greulich and Pyle atlas to assess skeletal age for four ethnic groups.
Mansourvar M; Ismail MA; Raj RG; Kareem SA; Aik S; Gunalan R; Antony CD
J Forensic Leg Med; 2014 Feb; 22():26-9. PubMed ID: 24485416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skeletal age estimation in a contemporary Western Australian population using the Tanner-Whitehouse method.
Maggio A; Flavel A; Hart R; Franklin D
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():e1-e8. PubMed ID: 27080619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of the applicability of the skeletal age determination methods of Greulich-Pyle and Thiemann-Nitz for forensic age estimation in living subjects.
Schmidt S; Koch B; Schulz R; Reisinger W; Schmeling A
Int J Legal Med; 2007 Jul; 121(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 17401574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a biometric method to estimate age on hand radiographs.
Remy F; Hossu G; Cendre R; Micard E; Mainard-Simard L; Felblinger J; Martrille L; Lalys L
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():113-119. PubMed ID: 28081518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Accuracy of age estimation in 14-year-old females by two skeletal age standards].
Xu YC; Ye LY; Li K; Wang ZY; Ke Y; Zhang QC
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 22(5):328-9, 332. PubMed ID: 17190140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forensic age estimation of living individuals: a retrospective analysis.
Santoro V; De Donno A; Marrone M; Campobasso CP; Introna F
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):129.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19853391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Applicability of Greulich and Pyle method for age assessment in forensic practice on an Italian sample.
Tisè M; Mazzarini L; Fabrizzi G; Ferrante L; Giorgetti R; Tagliabracci A
Int J Legal Med; 2011 May; 125(3):411-6. PubMed ID: 21221985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Greulich-Pyle and Gilsanz-Ratib atlas method versus automated estimation tool for bone age: a multi-observer agreement study.
Koc U; Taydaş O; Bolu S; Elhan AH; Karakas SP
Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 39(3):267-272. PubMed ID: 33067733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applicability of two commonly used bone age assessment methods to twenty-first century UK children.
Alshamrani K; Offiah AC
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):504-513. PubMed ID: 31372785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forensic age assessment of living adolescents and young adults at the Institute of Legal Medicine, Münster, from 2009 to 2018.
Hagen M; Schmidt S; Schulz R; Vieth V; Ottow C; Olze A; Pfeiffer H; Schmeling A
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Mar; 134(2):745-751. PubMed ID: 31907616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reliability of the Greulich-Pyle method in bone age determination among Australian children.
Paxton ML; Lamont AC; Stillwell AP
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Feb; 57(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23374549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applicability of Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to Indian children.
Patil ST; Parchand MP; Meshram MM; Kamdi NY
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):200.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22014975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reliability of the Greulich and Pyle atlas when applied to a modern Scottish population.
Hackman L; Black S
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 23061975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Bone Age Assessments by Gruelich-Pyle, Gilsanz-Ratib, and Tanner Whitehouse Methods in Healthy Indian Children.
Shah N; Khadilkar V; Lohiya N; Prasad HK; Patil P; Gondhalekar K; Khadilkar A
Indian J Endocrinol Metab; 2021; 25(3):240-246. PubMed ID: 34760680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation and comparison of dental, skeletal and chronologic age in Bangalore south school going children.
Shilpa PH; Sunil RS; Sapna K; Kumar NC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2013; 31(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 23886714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
