BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19688386)

  • 1. Hospital volume as a surrogate for laparoscopically assisted colectomy.
    Singla A; Simons JP; Carroll JE; Li Y; Ng SC; Tseng JF; Shah SA
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Mar; 24(3):662-9. PubMed ID: 19688386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variations in Laparoscopic Colectomy Utilization in the United States.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Carmichael JC; Mills S; Pigazzi A; Nguyen NT; Stamos MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Oct; 58(10):950-6. PubMed ID: 26347967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Growth of laparoscopic colectomy in the United States: analysis of regional and socioeconomic factors over time.
    Bardakcioglu O; Khan A; Aldridge C; Chen J
    Ann Surg; 2013 Aug; 258(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 23598378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
    Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The current status of emergent laparoscopic colectomy: a population-based study of clinical and financial outcomes.
    Keller DS; Pedraza R; Flores-Gonzalez JR; LeFave JP; Mahmood A; Haas EM
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3321-6. PubMed ID: 26490770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can laparoscopy for colon resection reduce the need for discharge to skilled care facility?
    Shaligram A; Smith L; Pallati P; Simorov A; Meza J; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4038-43. PubMed ID: 23793808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study.
    Dobbins TA; Young JM; Solomon MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Apr; 57(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 24608296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Payer status and access to laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis.
    Greenstein AJ; Romanoff AM; Moskowitz AJ; Sosunov EA; Khaitov S; Egorova NN
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Sep; 56(9):1062-7. PubMed ID: 23929015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geographic variation in use of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer.
    Reames BN; Sheetz KH; Waits SA; Dimick JB; Regenbogen SE
    J Clin Oncol; 2014 Nov; 32(32):3667-72. PubMed ID: 25287826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer.
    Keller DS; Parikh N; Senagore AJ
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 27572064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease.
    Robinson CN; Balentine CJ; Sansgiry S; Berger DH
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):897-903; discussion 903-4. PubMed ID: 22411487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospital-level outcomes associated with laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in the minimally invasive era.
    Fox JP; Desai MM; Krumholz HM; Gross CP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Nov; 16(11):2112-9. PubMed ID: 22948842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections.
    Peterson CY; Palazzi K; Parsons JK; Chang DC; Ramamoorthy SL
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Feb; 28(2):608-16. PubMed ID: 24091552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States.
    Fox J; Gross CP; Longo W; Reddy V
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 May; 55(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 22513427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.
    ; Kwon S; Billingham R; Farrokhi E; Florence M; Herzig D; Horvath K; Rogers T; Steele S; Symons R; Thirlby R; Whiteford M; Flum DR
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Jun; 214(6):909-18.e1. PubMed ID: 22533998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of hospital case volume on the quality of laparoscopic colectomy in Japan.
    Kuwabara K; Matsuda S; Fushimi K; Ishikawa KB; Horiguchi H; Fujimori K
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2009 Sep; 13(9):1619-26. PubMed ID: 19582520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004.
    Kemp JA; Finlayson SR
    Surg Endosc; 2008 May; 22(5):1181-7. PubMed ID: 18246394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases.
    Guller U; Jain N; Hervey S; Purves H; Pietrobon R
    Arch Surg; 2003 Nov; 138(11):1179-86. PubMed ID: 14609864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient, Hospital, and Geographic Disparities in Laparoscopic Surgery Use Among Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Patients With Colon Cancer.
    Ratnapradipa KL; Lian M; Jeffe DB; Davidson NO; Eberth JM; Pruitt SL; Schootman M
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Sep; 60(9):905-913. PubMed ID: 28796728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base.
    Zheng Z; Jemal A; Lin CC; Hu CY; Chang GJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Mar; 107(3):. PubMed ID: 25663688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.