These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19689549)

  • 1. Construction and validation of a Tamil logMAR chart.
    Varadharajan S; Srinivasan K; Kumaresan B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Sep; 29(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 19689549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
    Cho P; Woo GC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
    Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.
    Bourne RR; Rosser DA; Sukudom P; Dineen B; Laidlaw DA; Johnson GJ; Murdoch IE
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 12928690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.
    Rosser DA; Murdoch IE; Fitzke FW; Laidlaw DA
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 12928680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Construction and validation of logMAR visual acuity charts in seven Indian languages.
    Negiloni K; Mazumdar D; Neog A; Das B; Medhi J; Choudhury M; George RJ; Ramani KK
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):641-646. PubMed ID: 29676305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
    Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 12322840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
    Hardgrave N; Hatley J; Lewerenz D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The repeatability of best corrected acuity in normal and amblyopic children 4 to 12 years of age.
    Chen SI; Chandna A; Norcia AM; Pettet M; Stone D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):614-9. PubMed ID: 16431958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The repeatability of MNREAD acuity charts and variability at different test distances.
    Subramanian A; Pardhan S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):572-6. PubMed ID: 16909082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use.
    Plainis S; Tzatzala P; Orphanos Y; Tsilimbaris MK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):647-53. PubMed ID: 17632314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
    Veselý P; Synek S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of visual acuity assessment in normal and low visual acuity.
    Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
    Strabismus; 2007; 15(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17523039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork.
    Bastawrous A; Rono HK; Livingstone IA; Weiss HA; Jordan S; Kuper H; Burton MJ
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 133(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 26022921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new Gujarati language logMAR visual acuity chart: development and validation.
    Sailoganathan A; Siderov J; Osuobeni E
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 61(10):557-61. PubMed ID: 24212306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
    Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Brown G; Robson C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 20444125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reading acuity in children: evaluation and reliability using MNREAD charts.
    Virgili G; Cordaro C; Bigoni A; Crovato S; Cecchini P; Menchini U
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3349-54. PubMed ID: 15326160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A standardized logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity chart in Hindi.
    Sailoganathan A; Osuobeni EP; Siderov J
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):634-640. PubMed ID: 29676304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.