446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19689587)
1. Celebrate your limitations.
Lowe JB
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2009 Aug; 33(4):304-5. PubMed ID: 19689587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Do peer guidelines or editorial policies affect the reporting and discussion of race and ethnicity in pediatric research?
Ackerman PD; Kelly ML; Walsh CA; Ross LF
Account Res; 2005; 12(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 16021789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevention of false positive findings in observational studies: registration will not work but replication might.
de Jonge P; Conradi HJ; Thombs BD; Rosmalen JG; Burger H; Ormel J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Feb; 65(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 21113013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Replication publication.
Patterson M; Cardon L
PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e327. PubMed ID: 16149852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The dance about the "impact factor"].
Rehfeld JF; Nielsen LB; Jørgensen HL
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Jun; 169(24):2317. PubMed ID: 17594848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The new circulation research: a manifesto.
Bolli R
Circ Res; 2010 Feb; 106(2):216-26. PubMed ID: 20133905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Animal-welfare section in papers would be a burden.
Jimenez C
Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):259. PubMed ID: 17507960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who will start the 3Rs ball rolling for animal welfare?
Buck V
Nature; 2007 Apr; 446(7138):856. PubMed ID: 17443160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biased articles.
Friedman JH
Med Health R I; 2009 Mar; 92(3):70. PubMed ID: 19385378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. When abstracts conflict with published papers.
DeMaria AN
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1489-90. PubMed ID: 24112818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting human subjects: how much responsibility falls to editorial boards?
Wegman DH; Major E
Am J Ind Med; 2009 Feb; 52(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 19016264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Raising standards.
Nat Genet; 2013 May; 45(5):467. PubMed ID: 23619781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Raising standards.
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2013 May; 20(5):533. PubMed ID: 23649358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomical Sciences Education, clinical anatomy, and the anatomical record: take your pick.
Drake RL; Pawlina W; Carmichael SW; Albertine KH
Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan; 1(1):2. PubMed ID: 19177371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Author conflict and bias in research: quantifying the downgrade in methodology.
Vaccaro AR; Patel AA; Fisher C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(14):E895-6. PubMed ID: 21642805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The illusion of scientific objectivity and the death of the investigator.
Richardson ET; Polyakova A
Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Feb; 42(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 21752023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In pursuit of scientific excellence: sex matters.
Miller VM
Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Jun; 36(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 22665420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer code: incentives needed.
Hinsen K
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):37. PubMed ID: 21048747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The publication process itself was the major cause of publication bias in genetic epidemiology.
Calnan M; Smith GD; Sterne JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1312-8. PubMed ID: 17098574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
