477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19690021)
41. PET kinetic analysis: wavelet denoising of dynamic PET data with application to parametric imaging.
Shidahara M; Ikoma Y; Kershaw J; Kimura Y; Naganawa M; Watabe H
Ann Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 21(7):379-86. PubMed ID: 17876550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Nonparametric extraction of transient changes in neurotransmitter concentration from dynamic PET data.
Constantinescu CC; Bouman C; Morris ED
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Mar; 26(3):359-73. PubMed ID: 17354641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of residual oxygen-15-labeled carbon monoxide radioactivity on cerebral blood flow and oxygen extraction fraction in a dual-tracer autoradiographic method.
Iwanishi K; Watabe H; Hayashi T; Miyake Y; Minato K; Iida H
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Jun; 23(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 19360455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Optimization algorithms and weighting factors for analysis of dynamic PET studies.
Yaqub M; Boellaard R; Kropholler MA; Lammertsma AA
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4217-32. PubMed ID: 16912378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. PET kinetic analysis: error consideration of quantitative analysis in dynamic studies.
Ikoma Y; Watabe H; Shidahara M; Naganawa M; Kimura Y
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jan; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18250982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Motion correction of PET brain images through deconvolution: II. Practical implementation and algorithm optimization.
Raghunath N; Faber TL; Suryanarayanan S; Votaw JR
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):813-29. PubMed ID: 19131667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Bias in iterative reconstruction of low-statistics PET data: benefits of a resolution model.
Walker MD; Asselin MC; Julyan PJ; Feldmann M; Talbot PS; Jones T; Matthews JC
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):931-49. PubMed ID: 21248391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Accuracy of a method using short inhalation of (15)O-O(2) for measuring cerebral oxygen extraction fraction with PET in healthy humans.
Hattori N; Bergsneider M; Wu HM; Glenn TC; Vespa PM; Hovda DA; Phelps ME; Huang SC
J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):765-70. PubMed ID: 15136624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Motion correction of PET brain images through deconvolution: I. Theoretical development and analysis in software simulations.
Faber TL; Raghunath N; Tudorascu D; Votaw JR
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):797-811. PubMed ID: 19131672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Performance evaluation of a high-sensitivity large-aperture small-animal PET scanner: ClairvivoPET.
Mizuta T; Kitamura K; Iwata H; Yamagishi Y; Ohtani A; Tanaka K; Inoue Y
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 22(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 18600425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. An analytical scatter correction for singles-mode transmission data in PET.
Vandervoort E; Sossi V
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):402-12. PubMed ID: 18334435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Optimization of noninvasive activation studies with 15O-water and three-dimensional positron emission tomography.
Sadato N; Carson RE; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Campbell G; Hallett M; Herscovitch P
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1997 Jul; 17(7):732-9. PubMed ID: 9270489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A fast fully 4-D incremental gradient reconstruction algorithm for list mode PET data.
Li Q; Asma E; Ahn S; Leahy RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jan; 26(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 17243584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prediction model of chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma by 18F-FDG PET and MRI.
Cheon GJ; Kim MS; Lee JA; Lee SY; Cho WH; Song WS; Koh JS; Yoo JY; Oh DH; Shin DS; Jeon DG
J Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 50(9):1435-40. PubMed ID: 19690035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Fast reconstruction of 3D time-of-flight PET data by axial rebinning and transverse mashing.
Vandenberghe S; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Lewitt RM; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1603-21. PubMed ID: 16510966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Tracer kinetics analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR data in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: comparison of the results.
Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Bisdas T; Thng CH; Mack MG; Koh TS; Ernemann U
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19473200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Sensitivity and daily quality control of a mobile PET/CT scanner operating in 3-dimensional mode.
Belakhlef A; Church C; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 18006593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Imaging of weak-source distributions in LSO-based small-animal PET scanners.
Goertzen AL; Suk JY; Thompson CJ
J Nucl Med; 2007 Oct; 48(10):1692-8. PubMed ID: 17873140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Quantitative PET comparing gated with nongated acquisitions using a NEMA phantom with respiratory-simulated motion.
Vines DC; Keller H; Hoisak JD; Breen SL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 18006594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Time-resolved 3D pulmonary perfusion MRI: comparison of different k-space acquisition strategies at 1.5 and 3 T.
Attenberger UI; Ingrisch M; Dietrich O; Herrmann K; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Schönberg SO; Fink C
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):525-31. PubMed ID: 19652608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
