BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19691015)

  • 1. Fully specified bootstrap confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions based on the median unbiased estimator.
    Lin Y; Newcombe RG; Lipsitz S; Carter RE
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(23):2876-90. PubMed ID: 19691015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact one-sided confidence limits for Cohen's kappa as a measurement of agreement.
    Shan G; Wang W
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):615-632. PubMed ID: 25288510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommended confidence intervals for two independent binomial proportions.
    Fagerland MW; Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Apr; 24(2):224-54. PubMed ID: 21996567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations.
    Tang NS; Li HQ; Tang ML; Li J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):323-38. PubMed ID: 25632882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions.
    Maruo K; Kawai N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2288-96. PubMed ID: 24644149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data.
    Tang NS; Qiu SF; Tang ML; Pei YB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):233-59. PubMed ID: 20181778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data.
    Li HQ; Tang NS; Yi JY
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():31. PubMed ID: 26969507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical inference of risk difference in K correlated 2 x 2 tables with structural zero.
    Wang SF; Tang NS; Zhang B; Wang XR
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 19152229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quasi-exact method for the confidence intervals of the difference of two independent binomial proportions in small sample cases.
    Chen X
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(6):943-56. PubMed ID: 11870826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confidence intervals for the difference between independent binomial proportions: comparison using a graphical approach and moving averages.
    Laud PJ; Dane A
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(5):294-308. PubMed ID: 25163425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accurate interval estimation for the risk difference in an incomplete correlated 2 × 2 table: Calf immunity analysis.
    Lu H; Cai F; Li Y; Ou X
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0272007. PubMed ID: 35867721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Construction of confidence intervals for the risk differences in stratified design with correlated bilateral data.
    Qiu SF; Poon WY; Tang ML; Tao JR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):446-467. PubMed ID: 30933654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals for correlated proportion differences from paired data in a two-arm randomised clinical trial.
    Pei Y; Tang ML; Wong WK; Guo J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Apr; 21(2):167-87. PubMed ID: 20442192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous confidence intervals of risk differences in stratified paired designs.
    Tang NS; Qiu SF; Tang ML; Zou GY; Yu D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 Mar; 23(2):361-77. PubMed ID: 23437944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials.
    Schaarschmidt F; Biesheuvel E; Hothorn LA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):292-310. PubMed ID: 19212881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confidence intervals for proportion difference from two independent partially validated series.
    Qiu SF; Poon WY; Tang ML
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2250-2273. PubMed ID: 24448443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confidence intervals for a ratio of two independent binomial proportions.
    Price RM; Bonett DG
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5497-508. PubMed ID: 18781560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: a simulation study.
    Reichmann WM; Gagnon D; Horsburgh CR; Losina E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():1. PubMed ID: 21208427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Collaborative targeted maximum likelihood for time to event data.
    Stitelman OM; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 21. PubMed ID: 21969976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.