These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19691022)

  • 1. Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.
    Hsieh HN; Su HY; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3108-23. PubMed ID: 19691022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard.
    Kang L; Xiong C; Tian L
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2013 Dec; 68():. PubMed ID: 24415817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using confidence intervals to compare several correlated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Zou GY; Yue L
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5077-90. PubMed ID: 23824874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with an imperfect gold standard.
    Sun J; Tang C; Xie W; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2024 Jul; 80(3):. PubMed ID: 38994641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generalized linear mixed models for multi-reader multi-case studies of diagnostic tests.
    Liu W; Pantoja-Galicia N; Zhang B; Kotz RM; Pennello G; Zhang H; Jacob J; Zhang Z
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1373-1388. PubMed ID: 25847911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel tests for evaluating two ROC curves under paired samples.
    Hwang YT; Wang CC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):501-517. PubMed ID: 28541824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. COMPROC and CHECKNORM: computer programs for comparing accuracies of diagnostic tests using ROC curves in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhou XH; Higgs RE
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1998 Nov; 57(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 9822855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence intervals of the difference between areas under two ROC curves in matched-pair experiments.
    Zhang Y; Tang N
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(20):2621-2638. PubMed ID: 32390284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct estimation of volume under the ROC surface with verification bias.
    Shi S; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):553-581. PubMed ID: 37470408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bootstrap estimation of diagnostic accuracy with patient-clustered data.
    Rutter CM
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):413-9. PubMed ID: 10845400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
    Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the difference of areas under two correlated ROC curves under density ratio model.
    Zhang D; Zhang B
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):678-96. PubMed ID: 24648388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A modified Wald interval for the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in diagnostic case-control studies.
    Kottas M; Kuss O; Zapf A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Feb; 14():26. PubMed ID: 24552686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.