These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19691435)

  • 1. Species identity cues in animal communication.
    Ord TJ; Stamps JA
    Am Nat; 2009 Oct; 174(4):585-93. PubMed ID: 19691435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of repeated displays: a test of possible mechanisms.
    Van Dyk DA; Taylor AJ; Evans CS
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Sep; 210(Pt 17):3027-35. PubMed ID: 17704077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Call recognition in chicks of the Australian brush-turkey (Alectura lathami).
    Barry KL; Göth A
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Jan; 9(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 16160818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gaping displays reveal and amplify a mechanically based index of weapon performance.
    Lappin AK; Brandt Y; Husak JF; Macedonia JM; Kemp DJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Jul; 168(1):100-13. PubMed ID: 16874617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrasting theory with the empirical data of species recognition.
    Ord TJ; King L; Young AR
    Evolution; 2011 Sep; 65(9):2572-91. PubMed ID: 21884057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active space of a movement-based signal: response to the Jacky dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus) display is sensitive to distance, but independent of orientation.
    Peters RA; Evans CS
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Feb; 210(Pt 3):395-402. PubMed ID: 17234608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptation and plasticity of animal communication in fluctuating environments.
    Ord TJ; Stamps JA; Losos JB
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3134-48. PubMed ID: 20649812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of alternative adaptive strategies for effective communication in noisy environments.
    Ord TJ; Charles GK; Hofer RK
    Am Nat; 2011 Jan; 177(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 21117941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of performance-based male fighting ability in Caribbean Anolis lizards.
    Lailvaux SP; Irschick DJ
    Am Nat; 2007 Oct; 170(4):573-86. PubMed ID: 17891736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The chemical interaction of tadpoles of the frog Rana arvalis Nilss. with conspecific and heterospecific anuran tadpoles].
    Kiseleva EI
    Zh Obshch Biol; 1995; 56(1):108-17. PubMed ID: 7725786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The chemical interaction of tadpoles of the common frog Rana temporaria L. with conspecific and heterospecific anuran tadpoles].
    Kiseleva EI
    Zh Obshch Biol; 1996; 57(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 9027136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responses to chemical cues from animal and plant foods by actively foraging insectivorous and omnivorous scincine lizards.
    Cooper WE; Al-Johany AM; Vitt LJ; Habegger JJ
    J Exp Zool; 2000 Oct; 287(5):327-39. PubMed ID: 10980491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do common ravens (Corvus corax) rely on human or conspecific gaze cues to detect hidden food?
    Schloegl C; Kotrschal K; Bugnyar T
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Apr; 11(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 17762942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chemically mediated species recognition in closely related Podarcis wall lizards.
    Barbosa D; Font E; Desfilis E; Carretero MA
    J Chem Ecol; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1587-98. PubMed ID: 16718555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2235-47. PubMed ID: 17956386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recent biological invasion shapes species recognition and aggressive behaviour in a native species: A behavioural experiment using robots in the field.
    Dufour CMS; Clark DL; Herrel A; Losos JB
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jul; 89(7):1604-1614. PubMed ID: 32221966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-modality effects during male-male interactions of jumping spiders.
    Cross FR; Jackson RR; Pollard SD; Walker MW
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jul; 75(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 17482380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Silent tidbitting in male fowl, Gallus gallus: a referential visual signal with multiple functions.
    Smith CL; Evans CS
    J Exp Biol; 2009 Mar; 212(Pt 6):835-42. PubMed ID: 19252000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies.
    Uetz GW; Roberts JA
    Brain Behav Evol; 2002; 59(4):222-30. PubMed ID: 12138342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dawn and dusk "chorus" in visually communicating Jamaican anole lizards.
    Ord TJ
    Am Nat; 2008 Oct; 172(4):585-92. PubMed ID: 18729743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.