305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19691759)
1. Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Dig Endosc; 2009 Jul; 21(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 19691759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the effects on cardiopulmonary function of ultrathin transnasal versus normal diameter transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Japan.
Kawai T; Miyazaki I; Yagi K; Kataoka M; Kawakami K; Yamagishi T; Sofuni A; Itoi T; Moriyasu F; Osaka Y; Takagi Y; Aoki T
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(75):770-4. PubMed ID: 17591059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD.
Dean R; Dua K; Massey B; Berger W; Hogan WJ; Shaker R
Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Oct; 44(4):422-4. PubMed ID: 8905361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber vs. conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating esophageal varices.
Pungpapong S; Keaveny A; Raimondo M; Dickson R; Woodward T; Harnois D; Wallace M
Endoscopy; 2007 Aug; 39(8):673-80. PubMed ID: 17583856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective comparison between sedated high-definition oral and unsedated ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same subjects: pilot study.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Hidaka N; Ichise Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N
Dig Endosc; 2009 Jan; 21(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 19691797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger versus older patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Motomura Y; Matsui N; Kubokawa M; Kimura M; Ouchi J; Honda K; Endo S; Nakamura K; Takayanagi R
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 42(9):965-8. PubMed ID: 18622302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gauze pledgetting versus endoscopic-guided aerosolized spray for nasal anesthesia before transnasal EGD: a prospective, randomized study.
Hu CT
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jan; 71(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19748613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy?].
Taller A; Horváth E; Iliás L; Harsányi L
Orv Hetil; 2002 Feb; 143(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 11915188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-training in unsedated transnasal EGD by endoscopists competent in standard peroral EGD: prospective assessment of the learning curve.
Maffei M; Dumortier J; Dumonceau JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Mar; 67(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 18155215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
Madhotra R; Mokhashi M; Willner I; Hawes RH; Reuben A
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 12738460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Topical anesthesia for transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: spray, applicator, or both?
Moriyama T; Matsumoto T; Esaki M; Nakamura S; Kimura H
Dig Endosc; 2013 Jan; 25(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 23286252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of cardiopulmonary stress during endoscopy: is unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy appropriate for elderly patients?
Uchiyama K; Ishikawa T; Sakamoto N; Kajikawa H; Takagi T; Handa O; Tatsumi Y; Yagi N; Naito Y; Itoh Y; Takemura S
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 28(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 24288691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of transnasal small-caliber vs. peroral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating varices in unsedated cirrhotic patients.
Choe WH; Kim JH; Ko SY; Kwon SY; Kim BK; Rhee KH; Seo TH; Lee TY; Hong SN; Lee SY; Sung IK; Park HS; Shim CS
Endoscopy; 2011 Aug; 43(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 21660907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Ultra-thin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy].
Kawai T; Yamamoto K; Fukuzawa M; Sakai Y; Moriyasu F
Nihon Rinsho; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1264-7. PubMed ID: 20662204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
