These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19691944)

  • 1. Perceptual equivalence between vision and touch is complexity dependent.
    Phillips F; Egan EJ; Perry BN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Nov; 132(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 19691944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
    Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vision and touch: independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture?
    Whitaker TA; Simões-Franklin C; Newell FN
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():59-72. PubMed ID: 18585689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing and feeling volumes: The influence of shape on volume perception.
    Kahrimanovic M; Bergmann Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 20421094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Partial perceptual equivalence between vision and touch for texture information.
    Picard D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Mar; 121(3):227-48. PubMed ID: 16359632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: experimental and computational studies.
    Yildirim I; Jacobs RA
    Cognition; 2013 Feb; 126(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 23102553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality?
    Casey SJ; Newell FN
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 16597451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch.
    Gaissert N; Bülthoff HH; Wallraven C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 21752344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size.
    Van Doorn GH; Richardson BL; Wuillemin DB; Symmons MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):813-22. PubMed ID: 20348585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vision holds a greater share in visuo-haptic object recognition than touch.
    Kassuba T; Klinge C; Hölig C; Röder B; Siebner HR
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():59-68. PubMed ID: 23032487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superior haptic-to-visual shape matching in autism spectrum disorders.
    Nakano T; Kato N; Kitazawa S
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):696-703. PubMed ID: 22245010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch.
    Auvray M; Gallace A; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Oct; 126(2):79-97. PubMed ID: 17187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information.
    Gori M; Del Viva M; Sandini G; Burr DC
    Curr Biol; 2008 May; 18(9):694-8. PubMed ID: 18450446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Haptic-visual shape matching by mentally retarded children: exploratory activity and complexity effects.
    Davidson PW; Pine R; Wiles-Kettenmann M; Appelle S
    Am J Ment Defic; 1980 Mar; 84(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 7361830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Walton M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects.
    Craddock M; Lawson R
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1350-65. PubMed ID: 18927018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Poor haptic orientation discrimination in nonsighted children may reflect disruption of cross-sensory calibration.
    Gori M; Sandini G; Martinoli C; Burr D
    Curr Biol; 2010 Feb; 20(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 20116249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape.
    Norman JF; Norman HF; Clayton AM; Lianekhammy J; Zielke G
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 15129753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visuomotor sensitivity to visual information about surface orientation.
    Knill DC; Kersten D
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 91(3):1350-66. PubMed ID: 14586027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tactile-visual integration in the posterior parietal cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Nakashita S; Saito DN; Kochiyama T; Honda M; Tanabe HC; Sadato N
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Mar; 75(5):513-25. PubMed ID: 18355627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.