BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19692132)

  • 1. Sensory feedback dependence hypothesis in persons who stutter.
    Namasivayam AK; van Lieshout P; McIlroy WE; De Nil L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):688-707. PubMed ID: 19692132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bite-block perturbation in people who stutter: immediate compensatory and delayed adaptive processes.
    Namasivayam AK; van Lieshout P; De Nil L
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(4):372-94. PubMed ID: 18405914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anomalous sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: a tendon vibration study.
    Loucks TM; De Nil LF
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jul; 402(1-2):195-200. PubMed ID: 16698179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech skill learning of persons who stutter and fluent speakers under single and dual task conditions.
    Smits-Bandstra S; De Nil L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Jan; 23(1):38-57. PubMed ID: 19148812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gestural recovery and the role of forward and reversed syllabic repetitions as stuttering inhibitors in adults.
    Kalinowski J; Saltuklaroglu T; Guntupalli V; Stuart A
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Jun; 363(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 15172103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An experimental investigation of the effect of altered auditory feedback on the conversational speech of adults who stutter.
    Lincoln M; Packman A; Onslow M; Jones M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1122-31. PubMed ID: 20220025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stuttering inhibition via visual feedback at normal and fast speech rates.
    Hudock D; Dayalu VN; Saltuklaroglu T; Stuart A; Zhang J; Kalinowski J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 21401815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of self-generated synchronous and asynchronous visual speech feedback on overt stuttering frequency.
    Snyder GJ; Hough MS; Blanchet P; Ivy LJ; Waddell D
    J Commun Disord; 2009; 42(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 19304293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hand held two-channel vibro-tactile speech communication aid for the deaf: characteristics and results.
    Spens KE; Huss C; Dahlqvist M; Agelfors E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():7-13. PubMed ID: 9428037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of auditory disruption of lingual tactile sensitivity in skilled and unskilled speaking conditions.
    Krummel S; Petrosino L; Fucci D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Oct; 73(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 1766783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jaw-phonatory coordination in chronic developmental stuttering.
    Loucks TM; De Nil LF; Sasisekaran J
    J Commun Disord; 2007; 40(3):257-72. PubMed ID: 16889790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of neural structures involved in stuttering using vibrotactile feedback.
    Cheadle O; Sorger C; Howell P
    Brain Lang; 2018; 180-182():50-61. PubMed ID: 29747034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coordinating voicing onset with articulation: a potential role for sensory cues in shaping phonological distinctions.
    Loucks TM; Shosted RK; De Nil LF; Poletto CJ; King A
    Phonetica; 2010; 67(1-2):47-62. PubMed ID: 20798569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production.
    Civier O; Tasko SM; Guenther FH
    J Fluency Disord; 2010 Sep; 35(3):246-79. PubMed ID: 20831971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influences of arm proprioception and degrees of freedom on postural control with light touch feedback.
    Rabin E; DiZio P; Ventura J; Lackner JR
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 99(2):595-604. PubMed ID: 18032569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of temporal modification of second speech signals on stuttering inhibition at two speech rates in adults.
    Guntupalli VK; Kalinowski J; Saltuklaroglu T; Nanjundeswaran C
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Sep; 385(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15921852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of threat and cognitive stress on speech motor control in people who stutter.
    Lieshout Pv; Ben-David B; Lipski M; Namasivayam A
    J Fluency Disord; 2014 Jun; 40():93-109. PubMed ID: 24929470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novel tactile feedback to reduce overt stuttering.
    Waddell DE; Goggans PM; Snyder GJ
    Neuroreport; 2012 Aug; 23(12):727-30. PubMed ID: 22776903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.