These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19692132)

  • 1. Sensory feedback dependence hypothesis in persons who stutter.
    Namasivayam AK; van Lieshout P; McIlroy WE; De Nil L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):688-707. PubMed ID: 19692132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bite-block perturbation in people who stutter: immediate compensatory and delayed adaptive processes.
    Namasivayam AK; van Lieshout P; De Nil L
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(4):372-94. PubMed ID: 18405914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anomalous sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: a tendon vibration study.
    Loucks TM; De Nil LF
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jul; 402(1-2):195-200. PubMed ID: 16698179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech skill learning of persons who stutter and fluent speakers under single and dual task conditions.
    Smits-Bandstra S; De Nil L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Jan; 23(1):38-57. PubMed ID: 19148812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gestural recovery and the role of forward and reversed syllabic repetitions as stuttering inhibitors in adults.
    Kalinowski J; Saltuklaroglu T; Guntupalli V; Stuart A
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Jun; 363(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 15172103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An experimental investigation of the effect of altered auditory feedback on the conversational speech of adults who stutter.
    Lincoln M; Packman A; Onslow M; Jones M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1122-31. PubMed ID: 20220025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stuttering inhibition via visual feedback at normal and fast speech rates.
    Hudock D; Dayalu VN; Saltuklaroglu T; Stuart A; Zhang J; Kalinowski J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 21401815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of self-generated synchronous and asynchronous visual speech feedback on overt stuttering frequency.
    Snyder GJ; Hough MS; Blanchet P; Ivy LJ; Waddell D
    J Commun Disord; 2009; 42(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 19304293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hand held two-channel vibro-tactile speech communication aid for the deaf: characteristics and results.
    Spens KE; Huss C; Dahlqvist M; Agelfors E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():7-13. PubMed ID: 9428037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of auditory disruption of lingual tactile sensitivity in skilled and unskilled speaking conditions.
    Krummel S; Petrosino L; Fucci D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Oct; 73(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 1766783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jaw-phonatory coordination in chronic developmental stuttering.
    Loucks TM; De Nil LF; Sasisekaran J
    J Commun Disord; 2007; 40(3):257-72. PubMed ID: 16889790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of neural structures involved in stuttering using vibrotactile feedback.
    Cheadle O; Sorger C; Howell P
    Brain Lang; 2018; 180-182():50-61. PubMed ID: 29747034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coordinating voicing onset with articulation: a potential role for sensory cues in shaping phonological distinctions.
    Loucks TM; Shosted RK; De Nil LF; Poletto CJ; King A
    Phonetica; 2010; 67(1-2):47-62. PubMed ID: 20798569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production.
    Civier O; Tasko SM; Guenther FH
    J Fluency Disord; 2010 Sep; 35(3):246-79. PubMed ID: 20831971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influences of arm proprioception and degrees of freedom on postural control with light touch feedback.
    Rabin E; DiZio P; Ventura J; Lackner JR
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 99(2):595-604. PubMed ID: 18032569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of temporal modification of second speech signals on stuttering inhibition at two speech rates in adults.
    Guntupalli VK; Kalinowski J; Saltuklaroglu T; Nanjundeswaran C
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Sep; 385(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15921852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of threat and cognitive stress on speech motor control in people who stutter.
    Lieshout Pv; Ben-David B; Lipski M; Namasivayam A
    J Fluency Disord; 2014 Jun; 40():93-109. PubMed ID: 24929470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novel tactile feedback to reduce overt stuttering.
    Waddell DE; Goggans PM; Snyder GJ
    Neuroreport; 2012 Aug; 23(12):727-30. PubMed ID: 22776903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.