160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19692863)
1. The shrinking rates of different meshes placed intraperitoneally: a long-term comparison of the TiMesh, VYPRO II, Sepramesh, and DynaMesh.
Celik A; Altinli E; Koksal N; Celik AS; Onur E; Ozkan OF; Gumrukcu G
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2009 Aug; 19(4):e130-4. PubMed ID: 19692863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit.
Novitsky YW; Harrell AG; Cristiano JA; Paton BL; Norton HJ; Peindl RD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh.
Felemovicius I; Bonsack ME; Hagerman G; Delaney JP
J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Apr; 198(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 15051006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abdominal wall hernia repair: a long-term comparison of Sepramesh and Dualmesh in a rabbit hernia model.
Johnson EK; Hoyt CH; Dinsmore RC
Am Surg; 2004 Aug; 70(8):657-61. PubMed ID: 15328796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.
D'Amore L; Ceci F; Mattia S; Fabbi M; Negro P; Gossetti F
Hernia; 2017 Feb; 21(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 27757549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of prosthetic materials in incisional hernia repair.
Demir U; Mihmanli M; Coskun H; Dilege E; Kalyoncu A; Altinli E; Gunduz B; Yilmaz B
Surg Today; 2005; 35(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 15772793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of oxidized generated cellulose, polyethylene glycol and hylan G-F 20.
Altınlı E; Sümer A; Köksal N; Onur E; Senger S; Eroğlu E; Celik A; Gümrükçü G
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2011 Sep; 17(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 22090320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intra-abdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model.
Harrell AG; Novitsky YW; Peindl RD; Cobb WS; Austin CE; Cristiano JA; Norton JH; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
Am Surg; 2006 Sep; 72(9):808-13; discussion 813-4. PubMed ID: 16986391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair.
Burger JW; Halm JA; Wijsmuller AR; ten Raa S; Jeekel J
Surg Endosc; 2006 Aug; 20(8):1320-5. PubMed ID: 16865616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model.
Schreinemacher MH; Emans PJ; Gijbels MJ; Greve JW; Beets GL; Bouvy ND
Br J Surg; 2009 Mar; 96(3):305-13. PubMed ID: 19224521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental study of Composix mesh for ventral hernia.
Miwa K; Araki Y; Ishibashi N; Shirouzu K
Int Surg; 2007; 92(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 18050825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Biological behavior of polypropylene meshes suitable for intra-abdominal implantation in animal model].
Baracs J; Takács I; Shahram GS
Magy Seb; 2003 Oct; 56(5):171-6. PubMed ID: 15022620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 120-day comparative analysis of adhesion grade and quantity, mesh contraction, and tissue response to a novel omega-3 fatty acid bioabsorbable barrier macroporous mesh after intraperitoneal placement.
Pierce RA; Perrone JM; Nimeri A; Sexton JA; Walcutt J; Frisella MM; Matthews BD
Surg Innov; 2009 Mar; 16(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 19124448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sepramesh vs. Dualmesh for abdominal wall hernia repairs in a rabbit model.
Young RM; Gustafson R; Dinsmore RC
Curr Surg; 2004; 61(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 14972176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Formation of adhesion after intraperitoneal application of TiMesh: experimental study on a rodent model.
Delibegovic S; Koluh A; Cickusic E; Katica M; Mustedanagic J; Krupic F
Acta Chir Belg; 2016 Oct; 116(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 27426673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interposition of polyglactin mesh does not prevent adhesion formation between viscera and polypropylene mesh.
de Vries Reilingh TS; van Goor H; Koppe MJ; Bodegom ME; Hendriks T; Bleichrodt RP
J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17481981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal hernia repair with mesh surrounded by fibrous tissue: experimental study in Wistar rats.
Ricciardi BF; Chequim LH; Gama RR; Hassegawa L
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2012; 39(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 22836567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An experimental study of the adhesive potential of different meshes.
Baykal A; Yorganci K; Sokmensuer C; Hamaloglu E; Renda N; Sayek I
Eur J Surg; 2000 Jun; 166(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 10890547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fibrin sealant (Tissucol) enhances tissue integration of condensed polytetrafluoroethylene meshes and reduces early adhesion formation in experimental intraabdominal peritoneal onlay mesh repair.
Petter-Puchner AH; Walder N; Redl H; Schwab R; Ohlinger W; Gruber-Blum S; Fortelny RH
J Surg Res; 2008 Dec; 150(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 18468639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adhesions on polypropylene versus Sepramesh® meshes: an experimental study in rats.
Biondo-Simões MLP; Pessini VCA; Porto PHC; Robes RR
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2018 Dec; 45(6):e2040. PubMed ID: 30540100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
