BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19692978)

  • 1. The effect of a limited number of projections and reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of megavoltage digital tomosynthesis.
    Sarkar V; Shi C; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Diaz A; Eng T; Papanikolaou N
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 May; 10(3):155-172. PubMed ID: 19692978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
    Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fast reconstruction of digital tomosynthesis using on-board images.
    Yan H; Godfrey DJ; Yin FF
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2162-9. PubMed ID: 18561691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporation of local dependent reliability information into the Prior Image Constrained Compressed Sensing (PICCS) reconstruction algorithm.
    Vaegler S; Stsepankou D; Hesser J; Sauer O
    Z Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 25(4):375-390. PubMed ID: 26422578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital tomosynthesis: technique.
    Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 24792651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A reconstruction algorithm for coherent scatter computed tomography based on filtered back-projection.
    van Stevendaal U; Schlomka JP; Harding A; Grass M
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2465-74. PubMed ID: 14528968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two-arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study.
    Ning R; Tang X; Conover D; Yu R
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1694-705. PubMed ID: 12906186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of algorithms for out-of-plane artifacts removal in digital tomosynthesis reconstructions.
    Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Buliev I
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Jul; 107(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 22056810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical evaluation of the weighted Feldkamp algorithms applied to the 256-detector row CT scanner for volumetric cine imaging.
    Mori S; Endo M; Kondo C; Tanada S
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):701-12. PubMed ID: 16679272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics of megavoltage cone-beam digital tomosynthesis.
    Descovich M; Morin O; Aubry JF; Aubin M; Chen J; Bani-Hashemi A; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1310-6. PubMed ID: 18491525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Assessment of imaging performance of digital breast tomosynthesis based on systematic simulation].
    Deng Y; Zhu M; Li S; Wang Y; Gao Y; Ma J
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2021 Jun; 41(6):898-908. PubMed ID: 34238743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of scatter effects on image quality for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Boone JM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4425-32. PubMed ID: 19928073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Ghetti C
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1199-207. PubMed ID: 19472626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
    Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of Image Reconstruction Method on Image Quality in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis].
    Nishikawa M; Tominaga K; Ueno T; Yasukawa S; Hiroshige K; Mouri K; Kozawa Y; Uemura T; Fujimitsu R; Yoshimitsu K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 33473075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
    Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.
    Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1893-903. PubMed ID: 20443511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
    Polat A; Yildirim I
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.