285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19693640)
1. Femur ultrasound (FemUS)--first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD.
Barkmann R; Dencks S; Laugier P; Padilla F; Brixen K; Ryg J; Seekamp A; Mahlke L; Bremer A; Heller M; Glüer CC
Osteoporos Int; 2010 Jun; 21(6):969-76. PubMed ID: 19693640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
He YQ; Fan B; Hans D; Li J; Wu CY; Njeh CF; Zhao S; Lu Y; Tsuda-Futami E; Fuerst T; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between Parameters of Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound and Hip Structural Analysis in Osteoporotic Fracture Patients.
Zhang L; Lv H; Zheng H; Li M; Yin P; Peng Y; Gao Y; Zhang L; Tang P
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145879. PubMed ID: 26710123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distribution of bone density and cortical thickness in the proximal femur and their association with hip fracture in postmenopausal women: a quantitative computed tomography study.
Yang L; Udall WJ; McCloskey EV; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2014 Jan; 25(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 23719860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-site bone ultrasound measurements in elderly women with and without previous hip fractures.
Karjalainen JP; Riekkinen O; Töyräs J; Hakulinen M; Kröger H; Rikkonen T; Salovaara K; Jurvelin JS
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1287-95. PubMed ID: 21656263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discriminative ability of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in men with hip or distal forearm fractures.
Cesme F; Esmaeilzadeh S; Oral A
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016 Oct; 50(5):548-553. PubMed ID: 27680751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Device-specific weighted T-score for two quantitative ultrasounds: operational propositions for the management of osteoporosis for 65 years and older women in Switzerland.
Hans D; Hartl F; Krieg MA
Osteoporos Int; 2003 May; 14(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 12730788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and DXA of the lumbar spine and proximal femur in evaluating the risk of osteoporotic vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women.
Albanese CV; De Terlizzi F; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2011 Feb; 116(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 20927655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men.
Gonnelli S; Cepollaro C; Gennari L; Montagnani A; Caffarelli C; Merlotti D; Rossi S; Cadirni A; Nuti R
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 15599495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DXA of the hip and heel ultrasound but not densitometry of the fingers can discriminate female hip fracture patients from controls: a comparison between four different methods.
Ekman A; Michaëlsson K; Petrén-Mallmin M; Ljunghall S; Mallmin H
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 11315236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative ultrasound at the phalanxes discriminates osteoporotic women with vertebral but not with hip fracture.
Gnudi S; Ripamonti C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 15063517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture?
Museyko O; Bousson V; Adams J; Laredo J-; Engelke K
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 26415934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination.
Njeh CF; Hans D; Li J; Fan B; Fuerst T; He YQ; Tsuda-Futami E; Lu Y; Wu CY; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(12):1051-62. PubMed ID: 11256897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Sep; 71(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 12154392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with proximal femoral fractures--comparative study between quantitative ultrasonometry and gold standard DXA].
Schnabel M; Eser G; Ziller V; Mann D; Mann E; Hadji P
Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 16220445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A method for the estimation of femoral bone mineral density from variables of ultrasound transmission through the human femur.
Barkmann R; Laugier P; Moser U; Dencks S; Padilla F; Haiat G; Heller M; Glüer CC
Bone; 2007 Jan; 40(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16949896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
